Bruce v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/20/18. The deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal expert witness is CONTINUED to 8/31/2018. (Mena-Sanchez, L.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Thanh-Thuy T. Luong (State Bar No. 293859)
tluong@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive
Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612.4408
Telephone: +1.949.851.3939
Facsimile: +1.949.553.7539
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
RABECCA BRUCE,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
18
Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK
Hon. Magistrate Judge
Craig M. Kellison
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE FOR
SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURE AND
DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL
EXPERT WITNESSES
Complaint filed: July 25, 2017
19
20
Plaintiff Rabecca Bruce (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Experian Information
21
Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) (collectively, “the Parties”), pursuant to Local Rule
22
144, hereby stipulate to continue the deadline for supplemental expert witness
23
disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal witnesses by two weeks, to August 31, 2018.
24
The current deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and
25
disclosure of rebuttal experts is August 17, 2018. The Parties have been actively
26
working to resolve this case. The Parties would like the opportunity to exhaust
27
settlement discussions prior to incurring the costs and expense of proceeding with
28
further expert discovery.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL
AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK
1
Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the
2
deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal
3
witnesses by two weeks to August 31, 2018. There have been no prior requests for
4
extension of the deadlines set in the Status Order. The requested extension will not
5
alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by the Status Order.
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 17, 2018
JONES DAY
9
10
By: /s/ Thanh-Thuy T. Luong
Thanh-Thuy T. Luong
11
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.
12
13
14
15
Dated: August 17, 2018
16
By: /s/ Stephanie R. Tatar (as
authorized on 8/17/2018)
Stephanie R. Tatar
17
Attorney for Plaintiff
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/20/2018 _______ _____
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
Hon. John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL
AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, Thanh-Thuy T. Luong, declare:
3
I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Orange County,
4
California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled
5
action. My business address is 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800, Irvine, California
6
92612.4408. On August 17, 2018, I served a copy of the STIPULATION TO
7
CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT WITNESS
8
DISCLOSURE AND DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESSES
9
by electronic transmission.
10
I am familiar with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
11
California’s practice for collecting and processing electronic filings. Under that
12
practice, documents are electronically filed with the court. The court’s CM/ECF
13
system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the
14
assigned judge, and any registered users in the case. The NEF will constitute
15
service of the document. Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent to
16
electronic service through the court’s transmission facilities. Under said practice,
17
the following CM/ECF users were served:
18
Stephanie R. Tatar
Tatar Law Firm, APC
3500 West Olive Avenue, Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
T: (323) 744-1146
F: (888) 778-5695
Email: Stephanie@TheTatarLawFirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
19
20
21
22
23
Executed on August 17, 2018, at Irvine, California.
24
25
26
/s/ Thanh-Thuy T. Luong
Thanh-Thuy T. Luong
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL
AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?