Bruce v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/20/18. The deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal expert witness is CONTINUED to 8/31/2018. (Mena-Sanchez, L.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Thanh-Thuy T. Luong (State Bar No. 293859) tluong@jonesday.com JONES DAY 3161 Michelson Drive Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92612.4408 Telephone: +1.949.851.3939 Facsimile: +1.949.553.7539 Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 RABECCA BRUCE, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK Hon. Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE AND DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESSES Complaint filed: July 25, 2017 19 20 Plaintiff Rabecca Bruce (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Experian Information 21 Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) (collectively, “the Parties”), pursuant to Local Rule 22 144, hereby stipulate to continue the deadline for supplemental expert witness 23 disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal witnesses by two weeks, to August 31, 2018. 24 The current deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and 25 disclosure of rebuttal experts is August 17, 2018. The Parties have been actively 26 working to resolve this case. The Parties would like the opportunity to exhaust 27 settlement discussions prior to incurring the costs and expense of proceeding with 28 further expert discovery. STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK 1 Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the 2 deadline for supplemental expert witness disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal 3 witnesses by two weeks to August 31, 2018. There have been no prior requests for 4 extension of the deadlines set in the Status Order. The requested extension will not 5 alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by the Status Order. 6 7 8 Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 17, 2018 JONES DAY 9 10 By: /s/ Thanh-Thuy T. Luong Thanh-Thuy T. Luong 11 Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 12 13 14 15 Dated: August 17, 2018 16 By: /s/ Stephanie R. Tatar (as authorized on 8/17/2018) Stephanie R. Tatar 17 Attorney for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/20/2018 _______ _____ /s/ John A. Mendez________________ Hon. John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, Thanh-Thuy T. Luong, declare: 3 I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Orange County, 4 California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled 5 action. My business address is 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800, Irvine, California 6 92612.4408. On August 17, 2018, I served a copy of the STIPULATION TO 7 CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT WITNESS 8 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESSES 9 by electronic transmission. 10 I am familiar with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 11 California’s practice for collecting and processing electronic filings. Under that 12 practice, documents are electronically filed with the court. The court’s CM/ECF 13 system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the 14 assigned judge, and any registered users in the case. The NEF will constitute 15 service of the document. Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent to 16 electronic service through the court’s transmission facilities. Under said practice, 17 the following CM/ECF users were served: 18 Stephanie R. Tatar Tatar Law Firm, APC 3500 West Olive Avenue, Suite 300 Burbank, CA 91505 T: (323) 744-1146 F: (888) 778-5695 Email: Stephanie@TheTatarLawFirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 23 Executed on August 17, 2018, at Irvine, California. 24 25 26 /s/ Thanh-Thuy T. Luong Thanh-Thuy T. Luong 27 28 -3- STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT REBUTTAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES Case No. 2:17-cv-01541-JAM-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?