Lopez v. Solano State Prison
Filing
13
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/23/17 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EUTIMIO LOPEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 17-cv-1554 KJN P
v.
ORDER
SOLANO STATE PRISON,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 6.)
On August 15, 2017, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with thirty days to
19
20
file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) On August 25, 2017, plaintiff filed a letter with the
21
court (docketed as “amended complaint”) requesting an extension of time to file an amended
22
complaint. (ECF No. 11.) On September 13, 2017, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days
23
to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.)
Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to
24
25
the September 13, 2017 order.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
2
order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file an
3
amended complaint; failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.
4
Dated: October 23, 2017
5
6
Lop1554.osc
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?