Coleman v. Placer County et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER 16 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/25/2017 extending the deadline for defendants to respond to plaintiffs Complaint to 10/26/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1 PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE
Brett Holt (SBN: 133525)
2 [e-mail]
Julia M. Reeves (SBN: 241198)
3 [e-mail]
175 Fulweiler Avenue
4 Auburn, CA 95603
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Blake P. Loebs (SBN: 145790)
[e-mail]
7 David Mehretu (SBN: 269398)
[e-mail]
8 Robert S. Moutrie (SBN: 295250)
[e-mail]
9 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
555 12th Street, Suite 1500
10 Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
12
Attorneys for Defendants PLACER COUNTY,
13 DEVON BELL, JEREMY BURCH, DAN
CUNNINGHAM, AUBREY HARRIS,
14 MATTHEW SPENCER, MACKENZIE
MILLER, R. SCOTT OWENS, BENJAMIN
15 EGGERT and JENNIFER MISZKEWYCZ
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

18 BRENDAN COLEMAN, an individual,

Case No. 2:17-CV-01579-WBS-CKD

19

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

20 v.
21 PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a county
government, and the following persons as
22 individuals and in their capacity as officials,
employees or contractors of PLACER
23 COUNTY: DEVON BELL, ROBERT
MADDEN, MEGAN YAWS, JEREMY
24 BURCH, DAN CUNNINGHAM, AUBREY
HARRIS, MATTHEW SPENCER,
25 MACKENZIE MILLER, R. SCOTT OWENS,
BENJAMIN EGGERT, JENNIFER
26 MISZKEWYCZ and DOES 1 through 30,
27

Defendants.

28

Page 1

STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

The parties seek an order from this court to extend the deadline for service of a responsive

2 pleading or appropriate motion to Plaintiff’s Complaint by thirty (30) days. The parties have
3 previously stipulated pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a) to a twenty-eight (28) day
4 extension to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, which extended Defendants’ deadline to respond
5 until September 26, 2017. (See ECF No. 7.)
Now, the Parties seek the Court’s approval of an additional thirty (30) day extension, for

6

7 good cause and the convenience of the parties, extending Defendants’ deadline to respond to
8 Plaintiff’s Complaint from September 26, 2017, until October 26, 2017.
9
10

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

11
12 DATED: September 25, 2017
13
14
15

By: /s/ Blake P. Loebs
Blake P. Loebs
Attorneys for Defendants PLACER COUNTY,
DEVON BELL, JEREMY BURCH; DAN
CUNNINGHAM, AUBREY HARRIS,
MATTHEW SPENCER, MACKENZIE MILLER,
R. SCOTT OWENS, BENJAMIN EGGERT and
JENNIFER MISZKEWYCZ

16
17

LAW OFFICE OF PATRICK H. DWYER

18
DATED: September 25, 2017
19
20

By: /s/ Patrick H. Dwyer (as authorized on 9/25/17)
Patrick H. Dwyer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRENDAN COLEMAN

21
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF
22
23 DATED: September 25, 2017
24
25

By: /s/ Amie McTavish (as authorized on 9/25/17)
Amie McTavish
Attorneys for Defendant
ROBERT MADDEN

26
27
28
Page 2

STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

RIVERA AND ASSOCIATES

2
DATED: September 22, 2017
3
4
5

Attestation of Concurrence in the Filing

6
7

By: /s/ Jonathan A. Paul (as authorized on 9/22/17)
Jonathan A. Paul
Attorneys for Defendant
MEGAN YAWS

The filer, Blake P. Loebs, attests that all other signatories listed on whose behalf this filing
is submitted concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3

STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

ORDER
All Defendants may have an additional thirty (30) days to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

2

3 The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended until October 26,
4 2017.
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: September 25, 2017

7
8
9
28640972

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4

STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT