Robles v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/19/2018 ORDERING the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file the First Amended Complaint; Defendant County shall have 20 days from entry of this order to respond. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4

KEVIN W. HARRIS, SBN 133084
Attorney at Law
1387 Garden Hwy., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff PABLO ROBLES

5
6
7
8
9
10

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

PABLO ROBLES,

14

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01580-JAM-GGH

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SHERIFF
SCOTT JONES, in his official capacity,
DEPUTY HARDY (Badge No. 1434),
DEPUTY DANIEL (Badge No. 645),
DEPUTY MOVAHAN (Badge No. 452),
DEPUTY PAM (Badge No. 31), SGT. M.
LOPEZ (Badge No. 179), DEPUTY
MATOON (Badge No. 1095), OFFICER S.
ROBY (Badge No. 529), and Does 1-40,
inclusive,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
ORDER

Defendants.
___________________________________/

24
25

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant

26

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, by and through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Eastern

27

District Local Rule 143 and 144 as follows:

28

///
///
{01794777.DOCX}

1
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1)

1

Complaint filed, and Defendants’ previously pending Motion to Dismiss.

2
2)

3

errors and omission Plaintiff believes needed to be corrected, and address some

5

of the technical deficiencies raised in the prior Motion to Dismiss.

6
3)

7

The parties stipulate and further respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiff
leave to file a First Amended Complaint, which will be lodged.

8
4)

9

The parties further stipulate that Defendant COUNTY may have twenty days
from the filing of the First Amended Complaint to respond to the First Amended

10

Complaint. The parties note that they have met and conferred pursuant to the

11

Court’s Order re Filing Requirements (ECF No. 3-2), regarding the content of

12
PORTER | SCOTT

In the interest of expediting this matter, the parties agree that a First Amended
Complaint would clarify Plaintiff’s position and allegations, resolve some of the

4

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

The parties have met and conferred regarding deficiencies and ambiguities in the

the First Amended Complaint and any potential resolution.

13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14
15

Respectfully submitted,

16
17

Dated: March 19, 2018

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

18

By /s/John R. Whitefleet (authorized on March 15, 2018)
John R. Whitefleet
Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF
SACRAMENTO

19
20
21
22

Dated: March 19, 2018

23

LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN W. HARRIS
By /s/Kevin W. Harris
Kevin W. Harris
Attorney for Plaintiff

24
25

PORTER SCOTT

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

{01794777.DOCX}

2
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

ORDER

2

GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff leave to file the First

3

Amended Complaint. Defendant COUNTY shall have twenty days from entry of this order to

4
5

respond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: 3/19/2018

8

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
U. S. District Court Judge

9
10
11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

{01794777.DOCX}

3
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC; [PROPOSED] ORDER