Herrera v. Gray et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/31/2017 GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's amended complaint due 90 days from the date of this order's entry. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO HERRERA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-01585 GEB AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRAY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Armando Herrera (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 4, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with 19 leave to amend within thirty days. ECF No. 4. On August 28, 2017, plaintiff moved for a ninety 20 day extension of time to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 9. He claims that this lengthy 21 extension is necessary because he is an illiterate mental patient and the inmate who was 22 previously assisting him with his filings has been paroled. Id. at 1. In light of plaintiff’s 23 circumstances, the court will GRANT his motion for extension of time. His amended complaint 24 is due ninety days from the date of this order’s entry. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 31, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?