Herrera v. Gray et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/31/2017 GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's amended complaint due 90 days from the date of this order's entry. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARMANDO HERRERA,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-01585 GEB AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

GRAY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Armando Herrera (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action

18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 4, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with

19

leave to amend within thirty days. ECF No. 4. On August 28, 2017, plaintiff moved for a ninety

20

day extension of time to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 9. He claims that this lengthy

21

extension is necessary because he is an illiterate mental patient and the inmate who was

22

previously assisting him with his filings has been paroled. Id. at 1. In light of plaintiff’s

23

circumstances, the court will GRANT his motion for extension of time. His amended complaint

24

is due ninety days from the date of this order’s entry.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 31, 2017