Azevedo v. Britt

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/26/18 DENYING 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. No orders will issue in response to future fillings. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX LEONARD AZEVEDO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1609 KJN P v. ORDER RONALD W. BRITT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On September 14, 2018, plaintiff filed a request noting that he could not afford the cost 19 of copies to obtain a copy of his docket sheet, and also requested the appointment of counsel. 20 Plaintiff is advised that this civil rights action was closed on October 12, 2017. Therefore, the 21 appointment of counsel is not appropriate in this closed case. Plaintiff is advised that documents 22 filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to 23 future filings. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 19) is denied. 25 No orders will issue in response to future filings. 26 Dated: September 26, 2018 27 azev1609.31 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?