Ramos v. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing et al

Filing 24

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/23/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE by 05/07/18 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint by 05/07/18 will discharge this order to show cause. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of his case. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEONARDO RAMOS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-01610 TLN AC (PS)

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR
EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the

18
19

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On March 19, 2018,

20

the district judge adopted findings and recommendations dismissing plaintiff’s complaint but

21

granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint against one defendant. ECF No. 22. On

22

March 20, 2018, the undersigned instructed plaintiff that his amended complaint must be filed

23

within 30 days. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to timely file could lead to a

24

recommendation that the action be dismissed. Id. Plaintiff did not timely file an amended

25

complaint. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause by May 7, 2018 why this case should not be

26

dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint by the May 7, 2018

27

////

28

////
1

1

deadline will discharge this order to show cause. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court will

2

recommend dismissal of his case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 23, 2018

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2