Fielding v. Amtrak

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/22/17 ORDERING that the MOTION will remain on the calendar for 10/4/17, at 10:00 a.m. ECF No. 8 . Plaintiff and defendant are each expected to appear, and the court will address Defendant's MOTION as well as the status of this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAY FIELDING, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-01614-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMTRAK, Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for 18 punitive damages. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and accordingly this 19 motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The court instructed 20 plaintiff that her response to defendant’s motion was due by September 20, 2017. ECF No. 8. 21 Plaintiff did not submit a response. 22 Despite plaintiff’s lack of response, the motion will remain on the calendar for October 4, 23 2017, at 10:00 a.m. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff and defendant are each expected to appear, and the 24 court will address defendant’s motion as well as the status of this case. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 22, 2017. 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?