Alexander v. Yuba City
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/30/2018 APPROVING 31 Notice of Settlement and Stipulation and DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
1
2
DAVID L. BISHOP, Bar No. 219584
2155 Cecilia Way
Marysville, CA 95901
Telephone: (530) 923-7030
davidbishopesq@gmail.com
3
4
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Michael Patrick Alexander
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL PATRICK ALEXANDER
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
YUBA CITY, its agents, servants and/or
employees; NICOLAS MORAWCZNSKI,
JASON PARKER, COUNTY OF SUTTER;
Does 1-50 inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-CV-01622-WBS-CKD
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
DATE:
April 27, 2018
JUDGE;
William B. Shubb
COURTROOM: 5
Complaint Filed 8/4/2017
19
20
21
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff MICHEAL ALEXANDER (“Plaintiff”) and the last
22
remaining Defendant in this case, COUNTY OF SUTTER (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as
23
follows:
24
25
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the instant action naming the
COUNTY OF SUTTER as a defendant;
26
WHEREAS, on August 25, 2017, Defendant filed its Answer to the Complaint;
27
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2017, the Complaints against all other codefendants were
28
dismissed with prejudice by stipulation;
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2018, the Plaintiff agreed to release all claims in this Action for
consideration;
3
Based on the foregoing facts, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1.
5
6
7
This Court should dismiss the above-captioned Action in its entirety against
Defendant with prejudice.
2.
All upcoming hearing and deadlines are hereby vacated and the Action is hereby
terminated.
8
DATED:
9
10
April 27, 2018
/S/_David Bishop, signed April 27, 2018__
DAVID L. BISHOP
Attorney for Plaintiff, Michael Alexander
11
12
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
13
14
15
/S/ DANIEL BARDZELL
(As authorized on April 27, 2018)
DANIEL J. BARDZELL
Attorneys for Defendant County of Sutter
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER
ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to
close this case.
4
5
Dated: April 30, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?