Kreis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/31/18, ORDERING that defendant's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DEEMED timely. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 TONI A. KREIS, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-01633-JAM-CMK MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 DAY LATE 19 20 Defendant, through her counsel of record, moves for leave to file Defendant’s response to 21 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, one day late from the original due date of May 29, 22 2018, to May 30, 2018. 23 On May 30, 2018, Defendant’s counsel received a response from Plaintiff’s counsel 24 stating Plaintiff had no objection to an extension of time for Defendant’s response to be filed 25 May 30, 2018. 26 27 28 1 1 2 Defendant took additional time to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this case. 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Date: May 30, 2018 6 7 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 ORDER 12 13 14 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. DEFENDANT’S MOTION (DOC. 19) IS DEEMED TIMELY. 15 16 Dated: May 31, 2018 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?