Kreis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/31/18, ORDERING that defendant's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DEEMED timely. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8956
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
TONI A. KREIS,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01633-JAM-CMK
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT 1 DAY LATE
19
20
Defendant, through her counsel of record, moves for leave to file Defendant’s response to
21
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, one day late from the original due date of May 29,
22
2018, to May 30, 2018.
23
On May 30, 2018, Defendant’s counsel received a response from Plaintiff’s counsel
24
stating Plaintiff had no objection to an extension of time for Defendant’s response to be filed
25
May 30, 2018.
26
27
28
1
1
2
Defendant took additional time to fully review the record and research the issues
presented by Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this case.
3
4
5
Respectfully submitted,
Date: May 30, 2018
6
7
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
By s/ Carolyn B. Chen
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
ORDER
12
13
14
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. DEFENDANT’S MOTION (DOC. 19) IS DEEMED
TIMELY.
15
16
Dated: May 31, 2018
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?