Hines v. VA Mather Medical Center

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019 IT IS SO ORDERED Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be REVOKED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (USCA #19-15340) (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HINES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-CV-1634-DMC v. ORDER VA MATHER MEDICAL CENTER, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brought this civil action. Final judgment was 17 18 entered on February 7, 2019, and plaintiff has appealed. The matter was referred to the 19 undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status 20 should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case 21 in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. 22 American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the 23 court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous 24 and taken in bad faith. In particular, the court notes plaintiff failed to oppose defendant’s motion 25 arguing the action should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the 26 Federal Tort Claims Act. As such, this court’s lack of jurisdiction was undisputed. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro 4 Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 5 6 7 Dated: March 26, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?