Rogers v. Brown et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/31/2018 ORDERING that in regards to Notice of Related Case that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 No. 2:15-cr-00016-MCE Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KIM ROGERS, 15 16 Defendant. KIM EDWARD ROGERS, 17 18 19 20 v. M. RICHARD, CHP Captain Commander, et al., Defendants. KIM EDWARD ROGERS, 25 26 No. 2:17-cv-01643-KJM-DB PS Plaintiff, 23 24 No. 2:17-cv-00149-JAM-GGH PS Plaintiff, 21 22 NON-RELATED CASE ORDER v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. 27 28 1 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2 3 4 5 Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY 1,500 OPTICAL DISCS, etc., Defendant. 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 10 v. TEN USB FLASH DRIVES, etc., Defendant. 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 v. EIGHTEEN 8MM VIDEOTAPES, etc., Defendant. 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 20 No. 2:14-sw-00688-CKD-1 Plaintiff, 18 19 No. 2:14-sw-00687-CKD-1 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-sw-00686-CKD-1 Plaintiff, 8 9 No. 2:14-sw-00685-CKD-1 v. ONE USB FLASH DRIVE, CRUZER GLIDE, etc., 21 Defendant. 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:15-mj-00001-DAD-1 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, 26 Defendant. 27 28 2 1 The Court has received the Notice of Related Cases filed on January 26, 2018. 2 See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 123. The Court has determined, however, that it is 3 inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. 4 This Order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on 5 the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of 6 this Court. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?