Aceves v Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/12/18 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's Second Amended Motion for Summary Judgment to correct the citations to the record is due on March 15, 2018; Defendant's Opposition to the Second Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is due on April 5, 2018; Plaintiff's Reply in Support of her Second Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is due on April 19, 2018. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA B. KONS, LLC
Joshua B. Kons (SBN. 244977)
939 West North Avenue, Suite 750
Chicago, IL 60642
Tel: (312) 757-2272
Fax: (312) 757-2273
joshuakons@konslaw.com
6
7
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MARY ACEVES,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
19
20
21
22
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Defendant.
17
18
Case No.: 2:17−CV−01644−EFB
1.
All parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order
revising the briefing schedule as set forth below. Good cause exists for the request:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint on August 8, 2017, and Defendant
filed its Answer on November 30, 2017 and lodged the administrative transcript on
23
24
25
26
27
28
November 30, 2017.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Motion for Summary Judgement on January
16, 2018 and an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on January 18, 2018.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
- 1-
1
2
3
4
Defendant filed its Opposition to the Plaintiff’s First Amended Motion for
Summary Judgment and its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement on February 15,
2018.
5
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2018, Plaintiff’s counsel realized that several
6
7
citations to the record in its First Amended Summary Judgment Motion were
8
incorrect. This was the result of an inadvertent administrative error on the part of
9
10
11
Plaintiff’s counsel where they cited to the downloaded version of the ERE file
instead of the administrative record provided by the Defendant.
12
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel promptly contacted the Defendant was
13
14
amenable to a new stipulated briefing schedule so that this correction could be
15
made.
16
17
18
19
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree and stipulate to the following new
briefing schedule:
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Summary Judgment to correct
20
21
22
the citations to the record would be due March 15, 2018.
Defendant’s Opposition to the Second Amended Motion for Summary
23
24
25
26
27
28
Judgment would be due on April 5, 2018.
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of her Second Amended Motion for
Summary Judgement would be due on April 19, 2018.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
- 2-
1
SO STIPULATED.
2
3
DATED: March 12, 2018.
4
LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA B. KONS,
LLC
5
6
7
By
8
9
/s/ Joshua B. Kons
Joshua B. Kons
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mary Aceves
10
11
DATED: March 12, 2018.
12
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security
By /s/ Sharon Lahey
Sharon Lahey
Attorney for Defendant
Nancy A. Berryhill
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, the parties stipulation is
the Court makes the following order:
22
23
24
25
26
The revised briefing schedule in this matter is as follows:
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Summary Judgment to correct
the citations to the record would be due March 15, 2018.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
- 3-
1
2
3
4
5
Defendant’s Opposition to the Second Amended Motion for Summary
Judgment would be due on April 5, 2018.
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of her Second Amended Motion for
Summary Judgement would be due on April 19, 2018.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: March 12, 2018.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
- 4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?