Spearman v. Lifefactory, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2017 EXTENDING time until 10/16/2017 for Defendants to respond to the complaint.(Donati, J)

1 POLSINELLI LLP
NOEL S. COHEN. (SBN 219645)
2 [e-mail]
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300
3 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]
4 Fax: [phone]
5 Attorneys for Defendant Lifefactory, Inc.
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DUSTY SPEARMAN, on behalf of herself
10 and all others similarly situated,

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT; ORDER

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. 2:17-cv-01647-TLN-KJN

v.

13

Complaint Filed: August 8, 2017
Complaint Served: August 16, 2017

LIFEFACTORY, INC.,
14
15

Original Response Date: September 7, 2017
Current Response Date: October 5, 2017
Proposed New Response Date: October 16,
2017

Defendant.

16
17

Trial Date: Not Yet Set

18
19
20

Defendant Lifefactory, Inc., through its counsel, and Plaintiff Dusty

21 Spearman, through his counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
22
23

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on August 8, 2017.

24

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant on August 16, 2017.

25

WHEREAS, the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint was

26
27

extended to October 5, 2017 via Stipulation between the parties.

28
-1Case No. 2:17-cv-01647-TLN-KJN
60567638.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER

1
2

WHEREAS, the parties are attempting to resolve this dispute without the
need for further litigation in this Court.

3
4

WHEREAS extending this deadline would prejudice no party;

5

WHEREAS, for good cause shown, the parties stipulate to extend the

6

deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint to October 16, 2017 and
7
8 hereby submit that stipulation for approval by the Court.
9
10

Dated: September 29, 2017

POLSINELLI LLP

11
12

By:

13

/s/ Noel Cohen
Noel S. Cohen
Attorneys for Lifefactory, Inc.

14
15
16

BURSOR & FISHER P.A.

17 Dated: September 29, 2017
18

By:

19
20

/s/ Joel D. Smith
Joel D. Smith
Attorneys for Plaintiff Dusty
Spearman

21
22
23

Having considered the Stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:

24
25

Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is continued to October

26 16, 2017.
27
28
-2Case No. 2:17-cv-01647-TLN-KJN
60567638.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3 Dated: October 3, 2017
4
5
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Case No. 2:17-cv-01647-TLN-KJN
60567638.1

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER