Myrtle Street Flats LLC, v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/16/2017 ORDERING Defendant Emergency Construction Services, Inc.'s answer to 1 Complaint is due on 11/14/2017 or twenty-one (21) days after the filing of an amended complaint. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Michael E. Cardoza, Esq. (SBN 52264)
Jacqueline C. Murphy, Esq. (SBN 187732)
THE CARDOZA LAW OFFICES, INC.
1407 Oakland Blvd., Suite 200
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Emergency Construction Services, Inc.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
CITY OF VALLEJO, a public entity; VINCENT )
SPROETE, an individual; JACK McARTHUR, )
an individual; DANILE E. KEEN, an individual; )
)
LONELL BUTLER, an individual; ROBERT
)
CHAMBERS, an individual; MICHELLE
HIGHTOWER, an individual; EMERGENCY )
)
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., a
)
California Corporation; and DOES 1-25,
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________________ )
MYRTLE STREET FLATS, LLC,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No. 2:17-CV-01662-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANT EMERGENCY
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. TO
FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

20
21
22

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 144(a), Plaintiff Myrtle Street Flats, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and

23

Defendant Emergency Construction Services, Inc., (“Defendant”) by and through their

24

attorneys of record, respectfully request that the Court give effect to this stipulation related to

25

extending the time for Defendant to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The parties,

26

through counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

27

1.

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 10, 2017.

28
Stipulation to Extend Time

Page 1 of 2

2:17-CV-01662-JAM-KJN

1
2
3
4
5

2.

The original deadline for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint was

September 12, 2017.
3.

After meeting and conferring, Defendant agreed to extend the deadline to

October 12, 2017 for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint.
4.

Plaintiff and Defendants have met and conferred again regarding Defendant’s

6

deadline to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Due to Defendant City of Vallejo’s

7

pending Motion to Dismiss, the parties agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to file an

8

answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint until after said motion is heard.

9

5.

If the Court grants the request to extend the deadline, Defendant’s answer

10

would be due on November 14, 2017 or twenty-one (21) days after the filing of an amended

11

complaint.

12
Dated: October 13, 2017

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

13
14

By:___/s/______________________
Frank Busch, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Email: [e-mail]

15
16
17
18

Dated: October 13, 2017

19

THE CARDOZA LAW OFFICES, INC.

By:___/s/______________________
Jacqueline C. Murphy, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Emergency Construction Services, Inc.
Email: [e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Extend Time

Page 2 of 2

2:17-CV-01662-JAM-KJN

ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, IT IS SO

3

ORDERED that Defendant Emergency Construction Services, Inc.’s answer to Plaintiff’s

4

Complaint is due on November 14, 2017 or twenty-one (21) days after the filing of an

5

amended complaint.

6
7

Dated: October 16, 2017

/s/ John A. Mendez________
Hon. John A. Mendez
U.S. District Court Judge
Eastern District of California

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Extend Time

Page 3 of 2

2:17-CV-01662-JAM-KJN