Wagnon, et al v Rocklin Unified School District, et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/28/2022 GRANTING 48 Stipulation for Conduction of IME. The IME will be conducted as outlined in the order. (Perdue, C.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Carol A. Wieckowski, Esq. (SBN 95586) Cathleen J. Fralick, Esq. (SBN 146378) EVANS, WIECKOWSKI, WARD & SCOFFIELD, LLP 745 University Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916)923-1600 Attorneys for Defendants ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION AND DAVID HAWKINS Public Entity-Public Employees – Filing Fees Waived 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION ALICIA WAGNON in her individual capacity and as conservator for SULLIVAN R. FROM, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, vs. ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, DAVID HAWKINS and Does 1-30, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 2:17-cv-01666-KJN Stipulation and Order Regarding Independent Mental Examination Date of IME: October 3, 2022 Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: 5413 Sandpiper Court, Rocklin 20 Defendants ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLACER COUNTY OFFICE 21 OF EDUCATION AND DAVID HAWKINS (Hereinafter “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs hereby 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 stipulate to the following conditions of Plaintiff Sullivan From’s IME: As to the date, time, place and length of the exam, counsel for the parties agree the IME shall take place at Plaintiff’s home 5413 Sandpiper Court, Rocklin 95765, at 10:00 a.m. on October 3, 2022. The length of the exam will be 2.0 hours. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, the court will not set limitations on the kinds of tests Dr. Greene will be allowed to conduct. [See, e.g., Newman, 272 F.R.D. 505 (declining to limit the Stipulation and Order Re IME 2:17-CV-01666-TLN-KJN -1- 1 2 3 4 5 kinds of tests proposed without evidence that certain tests will be dangerous to the examinee).] Further, no specific limits are set on Dr. Greene’s questioning of Plaintiff Wagnon concerning Plaintiff From’s history. However, defendants are cautioned that Dr. Greene’s exam shall not be harassing to plaintiffs and shall not act as a second deposition. Thus, to the extent Dr. Greene can 6 conduct any investigation of Plaintiff From’s history prior to the examination, so as to lessen the 7 burden on Plaintiff Wagnon, the doctor shall do so. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Finally, Plaintiff Wagnon may terminate Dr. Greene’s examination if at any time, she feels, in good faith, that the examination is overly traumatizing to her son. Counsel for plaintiff shall review this good faith standard with Plaintiff Wagnon before the examination and shall make her aware that if the examination is ended early, it will be rescheduled for a future date. However, if the exam is prematurely terminated, it will be rescheduled to continue on a future date. The court will endeavor to make itself available on the day of the examination, should any good faith disputes arise requiring court intervention. Dated: September 15, 2022 18 Evans Wieckowski Ward & Scoffield, LLP By: 19 20 21 /s/ Cathleen Fralick Cathleen Fralick, Attorney for Defendants Rocklin Unified School District, Placer County Office of Public Education, and David Hawkins 22 23 Dated: September 26, 2022 Medina, McKelvey LLP 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Allison Hyatt Allison Hyatt, Attorney for Plaintiffs Alicia Wagnon, in her individual capacity and as conservator for Sullivan From 28 Stipulation and Order Re IME 2:17-CV-01666-TLN-KJN -2- 1 2 ORDER 3 4 5 6 It is HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties’ stipulation above, the Independent Medical Examination will be conducted on the conditions outlined above. Dated: September 28, 2022 7 8 9 wagn.1666 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order Re IME 2:17-CV-01666-TLN-KJN -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?