Wagnon, et al v Rocklin Unified School District, et al
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/23 ORDERING that a joint statement is due within 30 days of this order with a proposed pretrial conference date and trial date for consideration by the incoming magistrate judge. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALICIA WAGNON, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. 2:17–cv–1666–KJN
ORDER
v.
ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
The Court ruled on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding certain claims are
18
ripe for trial. 1 (ECF No. 74). No trial is currently scheduled, but the operative scheduling order
19
calls for a notice of trial readiness within 30 days after resolution of the summary judgment
20
motion. (ECF No. 28 at 4-5.) However, given the undersigned’s impacted schedule up through
21
his upcoming retirement in February of 2024, the court will not set a pretrial scheduling
22
conference or trial dates at this time. Instead, the parties shall confer over the submission of a
23
joint statement, as described below, and shall propose a pretrial conference date and trial date for
24
consideration by the incoming magistrate judge. The parties shall propose a pretrial conference
25
date for a date no earlier than May of 2024, and propose a trial start date no earlier than July of
26
2024. This joint statement is due within 30 days of this order.
27
28
1
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes, including
the entry of judgment, pursuant to the consent of all parties. (ECF Nos. 23, 24.)
1
1
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
2
The pretrial conference will take place before the incoming magistrate judge, and shall
3
take place on a date agreeable to the parties and in line with the court’s instructions above.
4
Counsel who appear at the pretrial conference shall in fact try the matter. Counsel are to be fully
5
prepared for trial at the time of the pretrial conference, with no matters remaining to be
6
accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local
7
Rules 281 and 282 relating to pretrial statements and conferences. A FAILURE TO COMPLY
8
WITH L.R. 281 AND 282 WILL BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.
The parties shall submit a joint pretrial statement (see L.R. 281(a)(2)) no later than seven
9
10
days prior to the final pretrial conference; it shall conform to Local Rule 281(b). Specifically:
11
1. The undisputed facts and disputed factual issues shall be set forth in two separate sections;
12
2. The parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each separate cause of action.
13
In this regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. Each fact
14
should (generally) relate or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action;
3. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the
15
16
Court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL
17
ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the
18
controversy concerning each issue;
19
4. The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues
20
is to apprise the Court and all parties about the precise issues that will be litigated at trial.
21
The Court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are
22
in dispute. However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, the Court will accept
23
agreements as to evidentiary facts; and
5. The joint statement of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the
24
Court concurrently with the filing of the joint pretrial statement.
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
Per Local Rule 281(b), the parties are required to provide with their pretrial statement a list of
2
witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what purpose. Of note:
3
1. These lists shall not be contained in the pretrial statement itself, but shall be attached as
4
5
separate documents to be used as addenda to the final pretrial order;
2. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically; Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
6
7
alphabetically; and
3. The pretrial order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and
8
exhibits at trial not listed in the pretrial order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will
9
be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel
10
do not intend to use will be viewed as an abuse of the Court’s processes.
11
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it will be counsel’s duty at the pretrial conference to
12
aid the court in: (a) formulating and simplifying issues and the eliminating meritless claims or
13
defenses; (b) settling of facts that should be properly admitted; and (c) avoiding unnecessary
14
proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must prepare their joint pretrial statement and
15
participate in good faith at the pretrial conference with these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO
16
SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, which may include monetary
17
sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as
18
the Court deems appropriate.
19
TRIAL SETTING
20
A jury trial shall commence before the incoming magistrate judge at a time agreed upon
21
by the parties and as instructed above. The first day of trial should be on a Friday, and will be
22
limited to addressing motions in limine, jury instructions, and other preliminary trial matters.
23
Jury selection will commence on the following Monday at 9:00 a.m. In the joint statement, the
24
parties shall indicate the anticipated number of days needed for the jury trial.
25
Dated: August 22, 2023
26
27
28
wagn.1666
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?