Wagnon, et al v Rocklin Unified School District, et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/23 ORDERING that a joint statement is due within 30 days of this order with a proposed pretrial conference date and trial date for consideration by the incoming magistrate judge. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALICIA WAGNON, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. 2:17–cv–1666–KJN ORDER v. ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 The Court ruled on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding certain claims are 18 ripe for trial. 1 (ECF No. 74). No trial is currently scheduled, but the operative scheduling order 19 calls for a notice of trial readiness within 30 days after resolution of the summary judgment 20 motion. (ECF No. 28 at 4-5.) However, given the undersigned’s impacted schedule up through 21 his upcoming retirement in February of 2024, the court will not set a pretrial scheduling 22 conference or trial dates at this time. Instead, the parties shall confer over the submission of a 23 joint statement, as described below, and shall propose a pretrial conference date and trial date for 24 consideration by the incoming magistrate judge. The parties shall propose a pretrial conference 25 date for a date no earlier than May of 2024, and propose a trial start date no earlier than July of 26 2024. This joint statement is due within 30 days of this order. 27 28 1 This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes, including the entry of judgment, pursuant to the consent of all parties. (ECF Nos. 23, 24.) 1 1 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 2 The pretrial conference will take place before the incoming magistrate judge, and shall 3 take place on a date agreeable to the parties and in line with the court’s instructions above. 4 Counsel who appear at the pretrial conference shall in fact try the matter. Counsel are to be fully 5 prepared for trial at the time of the pretrial conference, with no matters remaining to be 6 accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local 7 Rules 281 and 282 relating to pretrial statements and conferences. A FAILURE TO COMPLY 8 WITH L.R. 281 AND 282 WILL BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS. The parties shall submit a joint pretrial statement (see L.R. 281(a)(2)) no later than seven 9 10 days prior to the final pretrial conference; it shall conform to Local Rule 281(b). Specifically: 11 1. The undisputed facts and disputed factual issues shall be set forth in two separate sections; 12 2. The parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each separate cause of action. 13 In this regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. Each fact 14 should (generally) relate or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action; 3. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the 15 16 Court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL 17 ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the 18 controversy concerning each issue; 19 4. The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues 20 is to apprise the Court and all parties about the precise issues that will be litigated at trial. 21 The Court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are 22 in dispute. However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, the Court will accept 23 agreements as to evidentiary facts; and 5. The joint statement of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the 24 Court concurrently with the filing of the joint pretrial statement. 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 Per Local Rule 281(b), the parties are required to provide with their pretrial statement a list of 2 witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what purpose. Of note: 3 1. These lists shall not be contained in the pretrial statement itself, but shall be attached as 4 5 separate documents to be used as addenda to the final pretrial order; 2. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically; Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed 6 7 alphabetically; and 3. The pretrial order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and 8 exhibits at trial not listed in the pretrial order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will 9 be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel 10 do not intend to use will be viewed as an abuse of the Court’s processes. 11 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it will be counsel’s duty at the pretrial conference to 12 aid the court in: (a) formulating and simplifying issues and the eliminating meritless claims or 13 defenses; (b) settling of facts that should be properly admitted; and (c) avoiding unnecessary 14 proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must prepare their joint pretrial statement and 15 participate in good faith at the pretrial conference with these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO 16 SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, which may include monetary 17 sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as 18 the Court deems appropriate. 19 TRIAL SETTING 20 A jury trial shall commence before the incoming magistrate judge at a time agreed upon 21 by the parties and as instructed above. The first day of trial should be on a Friday, and will be 22 limited to addressing motions in limine, jury instructions, and other preliminary trial matters. 23 Jury selection will commence on the following Monday at 9:00 a.m. In the joint statement, the 24 parties shall indicate the anticipated number of days needed for the jury trial. 25 Dated: August 22, 2023 26 27 28 wagn.1666 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?