Bangert v. County of Placer et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/20/19 ORDERING for the reasons stated at the hearing, the undersigned finds that the settlement agreement does not preclude plaintiffs from filing a second citizens complaint.(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BEAU BANGERT,

12

No. 2: 17-cv-1667 KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

COUNTY OF PLACER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On February 13, 2019, an informal telephonic hearing was held to address whether the

17
18

settlement agreement filed in this action precludes plaintiffs from filing a second citizen’s

19

complaint. Julia Reeves appeared on behalf of defendants. Mark Merin and Paul Masuhara

20

appeared on behalf of plaintiffs.
For the reasons stated at the hearing, the undersigned finds that the settlement agreement

21
22

does not preclude plaintiffs from filing a second citizen’s complaint.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: February 20, 2019

25
Bang1667.cc

26
27
28

Plaintiffs’ counsel concede that they will not be able to file additional legal actions or claims
regarding the issues raised in the second citizen’s complaint, or the handling of that complaint.
1
1