Lisa v. AT&T West Disability Benefits Program et al

Filing 27

PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/6/2018 ORDERING the Court hereby APPROVES of said Protective Order and ORDERS the parties to comply with its terms. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LISA WAN , Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-EFB v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AT&T WEST DISABILITY BENEFITS PROGRAM, AT&T UMBRELLA PLAN NO. 3 , 16 Defendants. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Defendant AT&T 19 Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 31 (“Defendant” or the “Plan”) and Plaintiff Lisa Wan 20 (“Plaintiff” or “Wan”) and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and L.R. 141.1, that certain 21 documents, materials, or information produced in discovery in this lawsuit shall be 22 subject to the following Protective Order with respect to confidentiality and privacy, 23 subject to the approval of the Court. 24 Good Cause Exists to Enter Protective Order 25 1. The parties represent that disclosure and limited discovery in this action 26 27 28 Defendant is improperly identified in the case caption as “AT&T West Disability Benefits Program” and “AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3.” Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 1 1 will involve production of confidential or private information that, for competitive and 2 proprietary reasons, are normally kept confidential. Specifically, materials exchanged 3 in this litigation contain (1) highly-sensitive and private protected health information 4 concerning the Plaintiff; (2) confidential information pertaining to the services of a third- 5 party Claims Administrator in administering an Employee Retirement Income Security 6 Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) disability benefits plan, including claims processing figures that 7 are proprietary and not known to the public.2 8 2. The parties agree that protection of the confidential and proprietary 9 information at issue in this case should be addressed by Court Order, as opposed to a 10 private agreement between the parties, (1) because the claims administration 11 information requested in discovery (i.e., the number of benefits claims decided by the 12 Claims Administrator and outcomes of such benefit claims) does not specifically focus 13 on Plaintiff’s claim and, if not adequately protected, could potentially be used outside 14 this litigation in other lawsuits involving the Plan where the Courts have not ordered 15 limited discovery; and (2) because of the highly-sensitive nature of medical information 16 and documents concerning Plaintiff exchanged in this case. See L.R. 141.1. Scope of Protective Order 17 18 3. This Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) shall apply to all 19 information, documents, electronically-stored information, and other materials 20 disclosed, produced, exchanged, or otherwise disseminated in this case, including 21 without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, and other 22 information disclosed, produced, or exchanged pursuant to procedures set forth in the 23 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or by order of this Court. Collectively, such 24 25 26 27 28 2 Blanket protective orders are routinely approved for use in civil cases and consistent with the mandate that courts provide “just, speedy, and inexpensive” resolution in every action and proceeding. See Van v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., C 08-5296 PSG, 2011 WL 62499, at *2 (N.D. Cal. 2011). “The Ninth Circuit has implicitly acknowledged that the use of blanket protective orders conserve judicial resources—and taxpayer money—by eliminating the requirement that a party move for a protective order every time that party produces documents they contend are confidential.” Henry v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 3:!7cv-688-JM-NLS, 2018 WL 1638255, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018) (citing Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 2003)). Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 1 information, documents, electronically-stored information, and other materials shall be 2 referred to as “Discovery Material.” 3 4. As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in Fed. 4 R. Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning 5 of this term. 6 5. This Protective Order governs the parties’ treatment of Confidential 7 Information during the entirety of litigation, through any trial or appeal. This Protective 8 Order is not intended to affect or govern the Court’s treatment of documents. 9 10 11 6. The parties must still comply with their obligations under L.R. 141 to restrict access to all or a portion of the documents filed with the Court. 7. This Protective Order shall not abrogate or diminish any privilege or 12 contractual, statutory, or other legal obligation or right of any party with respect to 13 Discovery Material. 14 8. Nothing in this Order shall preclude any party from seeking or obtaining, 15 on the appropriate showing, additional protection with respect to the confidentiality of 16 documents or information. Nor shall any provision of this Order be deemed to preclude 17 any party from challenging the validity of the confidentiality of any materials so 18 designated (as set forth in paragraph 9, below), or from requesting the Court to amend 19 or modify this Order with respect to any particular matter. 20 21 22 9. Nothing in this Protective Order affects in any way, the admissibility of any documents or other evidence at trial. 10. This Protective Order shall remain in effect for the duration of the lawsuit 23 unless terminated by stipulation executed by counsel of record or pursuant to Court 24 Order. Insofar as they restrict the communication, treatment, and use of information 25 subject to the Protective Order, the provisions of the protective Order shall continue to 26 be binding after the termination of this lawsuit, unless the Court orders otherwise. 27 28 11. The disclosure of any Confidential Information pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order is not intended to be and shall not be construed as a waiver of any 3 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 right or a relinquishment of any confidentiality claim as to said Confidential 2 Information. Designation of Discovery Material as Confidential 3 4 12. Discovery Material designated as “Confidential” (“Confidential 5 Information”) shall be information, documents, electronically-stored information, 6 and/or other materials that are confidential and meet the requirements set forth in 5 7 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) and (b)(6), such as: (1) any non-public personal information or 8 protected health information; (2) trade secrets and commercial or financial information 9 that is either privileged or confidential; and (3) any other material qualifying for 10 protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 11 13. Before any information is designated as Confidential, counsel of record for 12 the designating party must first review the information and make a determination, in 13 good faith, that the information, documents, electronically-stored information, and/or 14 other materials are confidential or otherwise entitled to protection pursuant to 15 paragraph 6 of this Protective Order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 16 14. Discovery Material are designated as Confidential by placing or affixing (in 17 a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the notice “Confidential” or 18 “CONFIDENTIAL” on every page containing Confidential Information. Discovery 19 Material unintentionally produced without a Confidential designation or produced 20 before the Protective Order is issued may be retroactively designated in the same 21 manner. Objections to Confidential Designations 22 23 15. A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential 24 Information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. 25 The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the 26 parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time notice is 27 received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as 28 Confidential to advise the Court of the dispute pursuant to the Court’s procedures 4 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 concerning discovery disputes. If the designating party does not so notify the Court and 2 take such procedural action as the Court instructs concerning the dispute, then the 3 Confidential designation shall be deemed waived. If the designating party does notify 4 the Court and takes such procedural action as the Court instructs concerning the 5 dispute, the party asserting confidentiality shall have the burden of proving that the 6 Confidential Information is protected within the meaning of this Protective Order and 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G). Prior to the determination by the Court of the propriety of 8 the Confidential designation, the parties shall treat the disputed information as 9 Confidential. Limited Use and Dissemination of Confidential Information 10 11 12 13 16. Except as otherwise stated in this Protective Order, access to Discovery Material designated as “Confidential” shall be restricted as follows: a. Discovery Material and any information extracted from them that 14 have been designated as “Confidential” shall be used solely for the purposes of 15 prosecuting or defending this action, and for no other purposes. 16 b. “Confidential” designated Discovery Material shall only be 17 disseminated or shown to: (1) attorneys who are members or associates of the law firms 18 listed on the pleadings in this action and supporting personnel employed by counsel of 19 record, such as paralegals, legal secretaries, legal clerks, or document management or 20 photocopying services; (2) the named parties; (3) actual or prospective experts and 21 consultants retained or consulted by a party or a party’s counsel in the course of this 22 action; (4) any professional vendors or other persons or entities that provide litigation 23 support services; (5) any private mediator or other alternative dispute resolution 24 professional retained or selected by the parties or the Court to assist in the resolution of 25 the matter; (6) the Court and Court personnel. The persons identified in subparagraphs 26 (1) through (5) in this paragraph shall not disclose, discuss, or reveal the contents of the 27 Confidential Information or the Confidential Information itself to any other person or 28 entity not specifically described in this paragraph. Before an attorney of record in this 5 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 case discloses Confidential Information to the persons identified in subparagraphs 2 (3) and (4) of this paragraph, such attorney shall obtain a signed acknowledgement by 3 such person that he or she has read the Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its 4 terms. There shall be no other permissible dissemination of Confidential Discovery 5 Material. c. 6 No copies, extracts, or summaries of any document designated 7 “Confidential” shall be made except by or on behalf of counsel of record, and such 8 copies, extracts, or summaries shall also be designated and treated as “Confidential.” 9 17. Without written permission from the designating party or Court Order, no 10 party shall file any Confidential Information in the public record without first making 11 a request, with notice to all parties, to file the material under seal pursuant to L.R. 141. 12 18. At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon 13 in writing, each document and copies thereof that have been designated as Confidential 14 shall be returned to the party that designated it Confidential, or the parties may elect to 15 destroy Confidential documents, except that counsel shall be permitted to retain court 16 filings, exhibits, and work product that contain Confidential Information or references 17 hereto, subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Notwithstanding the 18 provisions of this paragraph, the parties and their counsel shall not be required to return 19 or destroy Confidential Information to the extent prohibited by law or to the extent such 20 Confidential Information is (a) stored on media that is generally considered not 21 reasonably accessible; or (b) only retrievable through the use of specialized tools or 22 techniques typically used by a forensic expert, provided such Confidential Information 23 shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. 24 19. If any person receiving and in the possession, custody, or control of 25 Confidential Information is served with a subpoena, demand, or any other legal process 26 seeking discovery material containing Confidential Information by one not a party to 27 this action, the receiving party shall give prompt written notice to the designating party 28 within forty-eight (48) hours of its receipt of such subpoena, demand, or legal party, 6 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 assuming the provision of such notice is not forbidden by law or legal authorities. 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 Dated: June 1, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 JESSE S. KAPLAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW CAMPBELL LITIGATION, P.C. HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan (as authorized on By: May 25, 2018) Jesse S. Kaplan By: /s/ Daniel M. Combs (as authorized on May 25, 2018) Daniel M. Combs (Admitted pro hac vice) Attorney for Plaintiff Lisa Wan Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 (incorrectly identified in case caption) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 Upon consideration of the Stipulated Protective Order between the parties in Lisa 3 Wan v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3, Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-EFB, the Court hereby 4 approves of said Protective Order and orders the parties to comply with its terms. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: June 6, 2018 HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN, CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?