Lisa v. AT&T West Disability Benefits Program et al
Filing
27
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/6/2018 ORDERING the Court hereby APPROVES of said Protective Order and ORDERS the parties to comply with its terms. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
LISA WAN ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-EFB
v.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
AT&T WEST DISABILITY BENEFITS
PROGRAM, AT&T UMBRELLA PLAN NO. 3 ,
16
Defendants.
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Defendant AT&T
19
Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 31 (“Defendant” or the “Plan”) and Plaintiff Lisa Wan
20
(“Plaintiff” or “Wan”) and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and L.R. 141.1, that certain
21
documents, materials, or information produced in discovery in this lawsuit shall be
22
subject to the following Protective Order with respect to confidentiality and privacy,
23
subject to the approval of the Court.
24
Good Cause Exists to Enter Protective Order
25
1.
The parties represent that disclosure and limited discovery in this action
26
27
28
Defendant is improperly identified in the case caption as “AT&T West Disability Benefits Program” and
“AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3.”
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
1
1
will involve production of confidential or private information that, for competitive and
2
proprietary reasons, are normally kept confidential. Specifically, materials exchanged
3
in this litigation contain (1) highly-sensitive and private protected health information
4
concerning the Plaintiff; (2) confidential information pertaining to the services of a third-
5
party Claims Administrator in administering an Employee Retirement Income Security
6
Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) disability benefits plan, including claims processing figures that
7
are proprietary and not known to the public.2
8
2.
The parties agree that protection of the confidential and proprietary
9
information at issue in this case should be addressed by Court Order, as opposed to a
10
private agreement between the parties, (1) because the claims administration
11
information requested in discovery (i.e., the number of benefits claims decided by the
12
Claims Administrator and outcomes of such benefit claims) does not specifically focus
13
on Plaintiff’s claim and, if not adequately protected, could potentially be used outside
14
this litigation in other lawsuits involving the Plan where the Courts have not ordered
15
limited discovery; and (2) because of the highly-sensitive nature of medical information
16
and documents concerning Plaintiff exchanged in this case. See L.R. 141.1.
Scope of Protective Order
17
18
3.
This Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) shall apply to all
19
information, documents, electronically-stored information, and other materials
20
disclosed, produced, exchanged, or otherwise disseminated in this case, including
21
without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, and other
22
information disclosed, produced, or exchanged pursuant to procedures set forth in the
23
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or by order of this Court. Collectively, such
24
25
26
27
28
2 Blanket protective orders are routinely approved for use in civil cases and consistent with the mandate
that courts provide “just, speedy, and inexpensive” resolution in every action and proceeding. See Van v.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., C 08-5296 PSG, 2011 WL 62499, at *2 (N.D. Cal. 2011). “The Ninth Circuit has
implicitly acknowledged that the use of blanket protective orders conserve judicial resources—and
taxpayer money—by eliminating the requirement that a party move for a protective order every time that
party produces documents they contend are confidential.” Henry v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 3:!7cv-688-JM-NLS, 2018 WL 1638255, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018) (citing Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
2
1
information, documents, electronically-stored information, and other materials shall be
2
referred to as “Discovery Material.”
3
4.
As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in Fed.
4
R. Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning
5
of this term.
6
5.
This Protective Order governs the parties’ treatment of Confidential
7
Information during the entirety of litigation, through any trial or appeal. This Protective
8
Order is not intended to affect or govern the Court’s treatment of documents.
9
10
11
6.
The parties must still comply with their obligations under L.R. 141 to
restrict access to all or a portion of the documents filed with the Court.
7.
This Protective Order shall not abrogate or diminish any privilege or
12
contractual, statutory, or other legal obligation or right of any party with respect to
13
Discovery Material.
14
8.
Nothing in this Order shall preclude any party from seeking or obtaining,
15
on the appropriate showing, additional protection with respect to the confidentiality of
16
documents or information. Nor shall any provision of this Order be deemed to preclude
17
any party from challenging the validity of the confidentiality of any materials so
18
designated (as set forth in paragraph 9, below), or from requesting the Court to amend
19
or modify this Order with respect to any particular matter.
20
21
22
9.
Nothing in this Protective Order affects in any way, the admissibility of any
documents or other evidence at trial.
10.
This Protective Order shall remain in effect for the duration of the lawsuit
23
unless terminated by stipulation executed by counsel of record or pursuant to Court
24
Order. Insofar as they restrict the communication, treatment, and use of information
25
subject to the Protective Order, the provisions of the protective Order shall continue to
26
be binding after the termination of this lawsuit, unless the Court orders otherwise.
27
28
11.
The disclosure of any Confidential Information pursuant to the terms of
this Protective Order is not intended to be and shall not be construed as a waiver of any
3
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
right or a relinquishment of any confidentiality claim as to said Confidential
2
Information.
Designation of Discovery Material as Confidential
3
4
12.
Discovery
Material
designated
as
“Confidential”
(“Confidential
5
Information”) shall be information, documents, electronically-stored information,
6
and/or other materials that are confidential and meet the requirements set forth in 5
7
U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) and (b)(6), such as: (1) any non-public personal information or
8
protected health information; (2) trade secrets and commercial or financial information
9
that is either privileged or confidential; and (3) any other material qualifying for
10
protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
11
13.
Before any information is designated as Confidential, counsel of record for
12
the designating party must first review the information and make a determination, in
13
good faith, that the information, documents, electronically-stored information, and/or
14
other materials are confidential or otherwise entitled to protection pursuant to
15
paragraph 6 of this Protective Order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
16
14.
Discovery Material are designated as Confidential by placing or affixing (in
17
a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the notice “Confidential” or
18
“CONFIDENTIAL” on every page containing Confidential Information. Discovery
19
Material unintentionally produced without a Confidential designation or produced
20
before the Protective Order is issued may be retroactively designated in the same
21
manner.
Objections to Confidential Designations
22
23
15.
A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential
24
Information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information.
25
The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the
26
parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time notice is
27
received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as
28
Confidential to advise the Court of the dispute pursuant to the Court’s procedures
4
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
concerning discovery disputes. If the designating party does not so notify the Court and
2
take such procedural action as the Court instructs concerning the dispute, then the
3
Confidential designation shall be deemed waived. If the designating party does notify
4
the Court and takes such procedural action as the Court instructs concerning the
5
dispute, the party asserting confidentiality shall have the burden of proving that the
6
Confidential Information is protected within the meaning of this Protective Order and
7
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G). Prior to the determination by the Court of the propriety of
8
the Confidential designation, the parties shall treat the disputed information as
9
Confidential.
Limited Use and Dissemination of Confidential Information
10
11
12
13
16.
Except as otherwise stated in this Protective Order, access to Discovery
Material designated as “Confidential” shall be restricted as follows:
a.
Discovery Material and any information extracted from them that
14
have been designated as “Confidential” shall be used solely for the purposes of
15
prosecuting or defending this action, and for no other purposes.
16
b.
“Confidential” designated Discovery Material shall only be
17
disseminated or shown to: (1) attorneys who are members or associates of the law firms
18
listed on the pleadings in this action and supporting personnel employed by counsel of
19
record, such as paralegals, legal secretaries, legal clerks, or document management or
20
photocopying services; (2) the named parties; (3) actual or prospective experts and
21
consultants retained or consulted by a party or a party’s counsel in the course of this
22
action; (4) any professional vendors or other persons or entities that provide litigation
23
support services; (5) any private mediator or other alternative dispute resolution
24
professional retained or selected by the parties or the Court to assist in the resolution of
25
the matter; (6) the Court and Court personnel. The persons identified in subparagraphs
26
(1) through (5) in this paragraph shall not disclose, discuss, or reveal the contents of the
27
Confidential Information or the Confidential Information itself to any other person or
28
entity not specifically described in this paragraph. Before an attorney of record in this
5
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
case discloses Confidential Information to the persons identified in subparagraphs
2
(3) and (4) of this paragraph, such attorney shall obtain a signed acknowledgement by
3
such person that he or she has read the Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its
4
terms. There shall be no other permissible dissemination of Confidential Discovery
5
Material.
c.
6
No copies, extracts, or summaries of any document designated
7
“Confidential” shall be made except by or on behalf of counsel of record, and such
8
copies, extracts, or summaries shall also be designated and treated as “Confidential.”
9
17.
Without written permission from the designating party or Court Order, no
10
party shall file any Confidential Information in the public record without first making
11
a request, with notice to all parties, to file the material under seal pursuant to L.R. 141.
12
18.
At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon
13
in writing, each document and copies thereof that have been designated as Confidential
14
shall be returned to the party that designated it Confidential, or the parties may elect to
15
destroy Confidential documents, except that counsel shall be permitted to retain court
16
filings, exhibits, and work product that contain Confidential Information or references
17
hereto, subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Notwithstanding the
18
provisions of this paragraph, the parties and their counsel shall not be required to return
19
or destroy Confidential Information to the extent prohibited by law or to the extent such
20
Confidential Information is (a) stored on media that is generally considered not
21
reasonably accessible; or (b) only retrievable through the use of specialized tools or
22
techniques typically used by a forensic expert, provided such Confidential Information
23
shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective Order.
24
19.
If any person receiving and in the possession, custody, or control of
25
Confidential Information is served with a subpoena, demand, or any other legal process
26
seeking discovery material containing Confidential Information by one not a party to
27
this action, the receiving party shall give prompt written notice to the designating party
28
within forty-eight (48) hours of its receipt of such subpoena, demand, or legal party,
6
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
assuming the provision of such notice is not forbidden by law or legal authorities.
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3
Dated: June 1, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
JESSE S. KAPLAN, ATTORNEY AT
LAW
CAMPBELL LITIGATION, P.C.
HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON
/s/ Jesse S. Kaplan (as authorized on
By: May 25, 2018)
Jesse S. Kaplan
By: /s/ Daniel M. Combs (as authorized
on May 25, 2018)
Daniel M. Combs
(Admitted pro hac vice)
Attorney for Plaintiff Lisa Wan
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Umbrella
Benefit Plan No. 3 (incorrectly identified
in case caption)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
Upon consideration of the Stipulated Protective Order between the parties in Lisa
3
Wan v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3, Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-EFB, the Court hereby
4
approves of said Protective Order and orders the parties to comply with its terms.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: June 6, 2018
HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN,
CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
Ex. A - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?