Peterson v. Lizarraga
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/26/2017 CONSTRUING petitioner's 6 request for an order requiring access to his legal materials a motion pursuant to the All Writ Act, and so construed is GRANTED to the extent that the respondent, who is warden at Mule Creek State Prison, shall inform the court, within 21 days, if petitioner has been denied access to his legal property and if so, must inform the court of the accommodation being made to permit petitioner to pros ecute this action. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the Warden Joe Lizarraga and amend the caption on the pleadings to show him as the respondent as reflected in this order. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on Tami Krenzin , Senior Assitant CA Attorney General. Petitioner's time to file a completed petition will be held in abeyance until this court has determined that he has received the materials addressed here at which time the filing requirement will be provided by order of the court. (cc: Tammy Krenzin) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD PETERSON,
12
No. 2:17-cv-01693-GGH
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
J. LIZARRAGA,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner appears in pro se in this habeas proceeding.1 On August 21, 2017 this court
17
18
issued an Order which, among other things, addressed petitioner’s claim that he had not received
19
twelve (12) boxes of legal documents and personal property which included his typewriter and
20
other materials that he would need in aid of filing his habeas corpus petition with this court. ECF
21
No. 4. Petitioner was advised to notify the court if he did not receive those documents on or
22
before September 15, 2017. Id. On September 20, 2017 petitioner filed a request for an order
23
(signed on September 15, 2017), ECF No. 6, seeking an Order for provision of those documents
24
and materials in which he stated that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
25
Sarah Smith had contacted his wife on August 22, 2017, and informed her that the materials
26
1
27
28
Petitioner’s Informa Pauperis Motion is under submission awaiting a
Certified Prison Trust Account Statement from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation which has been requested by a Clerk’s Notice issued September 22, 2017 with a 72
hour production demand. ECF No. 7.
1
1
would be picked up from the California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi and delivered to
2
petitioner’s present place of incarceration at Mule Creek within one week but that such delivery
3
had not ensued as of September 15, 2017. ECF No. 6.
4
As is evident from the foregoing, petitioner’s claim that he is being deprived of legal
5
materials and property does not go to the merits of his habeas claims. Accordingly, this matter
6
may be handled by court order. In light of the fact that petitioner has had one extension of time to
7
file his petition based on the absence of the foregoing materials for which he has made repeated
8
requests and now must be given another, the court will invoke the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. §
9
1651(a). This Act permits the court to issue writs “necessary or appropriate in aid of [its]
10
jurisdiction and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” See generally S.E.C. v. G.C.
11
George Securities, Inc., 637 F.2d 685 (9th Cir. 1981); United States v. New York Telephone Co.,
12
434 U.S. 159 (1977). This section does not grant the court plenary power to act in any way it
13
wishes; rather, the All Writs Act is meant to aid the court in the exercise and preservation of its
14
jurisdiction. Plum Creek Lumber Company v. Hutton, 608 F.2d 1283, 1289 (9th Cir. 1979).
15
The court is concerned that it may lose its jurisdiction if petitioner is unable to prosecute
16
this action because he cannot have access to his legal property at Mule Creek State Prison where
17
he is presently housed.
18
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1.
Petitioner’s request for an Order requiring access to his legal materials is construed
20
as a motion pursuant to the All Writ Act, and as so construed is granted to the extent that the
21
respondent, who is warden at Mule Creek State Prison, or his designee is ordered to inform this
22
court, within twenty-one days, if petitioner has been denied access to his legal property and, if so,
23
must inform the court of the accommodation being made to permit petitioner to prosecute this
24
action;
25
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Warden Joe Lizarraga
26
by first class mail and shall amend the caption on the pleadings to show him as the Respondent as
27
reflected in this order;
28
////
2
1
2
3
3.
The Clerk shall serve a courtesy copy of this Order on Tami Krenzin, Senior
Assistant California Attorney General
4.
Petitioner’s time to file a completed petition will be held in abeyance until this
4
court has determined that he has received the materials addressed here at which time the filing
5
requirement will be provided by order of the court.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 26, 2017
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?