Blackman v. Brown et al
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/08/18 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall pay the entire $400.00 in required fees within 30 days or face dismissal of the case. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY BLACKMAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1708 KJM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 21, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
27
the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
28
the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2017 (ECF No. 12) are adopted
3
in full;
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and
5
3. Plaintiff shall pay the entire $400.00 in required fees within thirty days or face
6
dismissal of the case.
7
DATED: March 8, 2018.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?