Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/29/17 ORDERING that the parties' 6 Stipulation for Relief from VDRP is DENIED for lack of any meaningful information or explanation as to why the parities believe participation in VDRP would be futile. The parties may renew their request with explanation, if they are able. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a
Washington Corporation;
and Does 1-10,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01718-KJM-KJN
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE STIPULATION AND
REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM
COURT ORDER REQUIRING
VDRP

Defendants.

18
19

The request and stipulation of plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON and defendant

20

STARBUCKS CORPORATION that the parties be relieved of this court’s order

21

requiring VDRP is denied for lack of any meaningful information or explanation

22

as to why the parities believe participation in VDRP would be futile. The parties

23

may renew their request with explanation, if they are able.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 29, 2017.

26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE