Hash v. Rallos et al

Filing 139

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/17/2023 ORDERING that rulings on objections inserted in hybrid discovery responses be deferred to the time of trial to be determined by trial judge. This stipulation does not apply to discovery responses consisting solely of objections. (Spichka, K.)

(
1
r

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

(

ROB HtNTA, State Bar No. 202668
' Attorney General of California
ALICIA A. BOWER, State Bar No. 287799
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
R. LAWRENCE BRAGG, State Bar No. 119194
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Solorzano, Muhammad,
Thomas, Boyd, Just, Brida, Sandy, Perera, Farinas,
Shirley, Cruzen, Silva, Lemmons, Austin,
Faggianelli; Johnson, and Schwimmer

9
10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

13

14
2:17-cv-01721 TLN AC PC

LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH,

15
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION RE: RULINGS ON
DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS;
(PROPOSED) ORDER

16
v.

17
18
19

Judge:
The Honorable Allison Claire
Trial Date:
Not Set
Action Filed: August 11, 2017

T. RALLOS, et al.,

Defendants.

20
21
22

During the meet and confer process concerning Defendants' discovery responses ordered

23

by the Court (ECF No. 114), the parties discussed hybrid responses submitted by Defendants

24

containing objections in which the Defendants responded to the request without waiving the

25.

objections. In order to avoid a situation in which Plaintiff files a motion to compel a further

26

response solely to challenge a discovery objection, the parties stipulate that rulings on objections

27

inserted in hybrid discovery responses be deferred to the time of trial to be determined by trial

28

1
STIPULATION RE: RULINGS ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS; (PROPOSED) ORDER (2: 17-cv-01721 TLN
.
ACPC)

(
1

(

judge. This stipulation does not apply to discovery responses consisting solely of objections.

2
3

Respectfully submitted,

4

RoBBONTA

5

Attorney General of California
ALICIA A. BOWER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

6

7

~

8

R.LAWRENCEBRA.__QQ_ _

(
_, •:!J

Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants Solorzano,
Muhammad, Thomas, Boyd, Just, Brida,
Sandy, Perera, Farinas, Shirley, Cruzen,
Silva, Lemmons, Austin, Faggianelli,
Johnson, and Schwimmer

9

10
11

12
13
14

Dated: AUGit~r 3;, '.2.013

15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

Dated: August 17, 2023
HON. ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21

22
23

SA2021300155
37367352.docx

24

25

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION RE: RULINGS ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS; (PROPOSED) ORDER (2: 17-cv-01721 TLN
ACPC)