Hash v. Rallos et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/08/21 GRANTING 41 Motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project; and LIFTING the STAY of this action. Within 30 days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file a response to the complaint. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
T. RALLOS, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights
18
action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 25, 2021, this case was
19
referred to the court’s Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed
20
for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 39. That order provided defendants the opportunity to request
21
opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be
22
a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendants now request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR
23
Project and that the stay be lifted. ECF No. 41. Having reviewed the request, the court finds
24
good cause to grant it.
25
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Defendants’ request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project, ECF No. 41, is
27
28
GRANTED.
2. The stay of this action, commencing February 25, 2021, ECF No. 39, is LIFTED.
1
1
3. Within thirty days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file a response to the
2
complaint.
3
DATED: April 8, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?