Knutson v. Spearman
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING Plaintiff's 9 First Amended Complaint without leave to amend and DENYING Plaintiff's 8 Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD KNUTSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1725 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. The matter was referred to a United States
17
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 27, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff
22
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 13, 2018 (ECF No. 13), are adopted
26
27
28
in full;
2. Plaintiffs first amended complaint (ECF No. 9) is dismissed without leave to amend.
1
1
2
3. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (ECF No.
8) is denied.
3
4
5
DATED: April 26, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?