McCurdy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 1/24/18, are ADOPTED in full; and All defendants other than Defendant Thomas are DISMISSED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES C. MCCURDY,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1736-TLN-CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On January 24, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2018, are adopted in full; and
3
2. All defendants other than Defendant Thomas are DISMISSED.
4
5
Dated: September 10, 2018
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?