TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. Marker Oil Company, Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/2018 GRANTING 38 Motion for Contempt. The Court SANCTIONS Defendants, jointly and severally, and orders them to pay $139,653.28 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this order as compen sation for the eight units. The Court further orders Defendants, jointly and severally, to pay an additional $15,000.00 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this order as reimbursement to TCFIF for its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TCF INVENTORY FINANCE, INC., 10 2:17-cv-1768-JAM-DB Plaintiff, 11 12 No. v. MARKER OIL COMPANY, INC., and BILLY LEON MARKER, JR., ORDER GRANTING TCF INVENTORY FINANCE, INC.’S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AGAINST DEFENDANTS 13 Defendants. 14 15 On September 11, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary 16 injunction against Defendants Marker Oil Company, Inc. (“Marker 17 Oil”) and Billy Leon Marker, Jr. (collectively, “Defendants”) 18 ordering, adjudging, and decreeing that Marker Oil and its 19 officers, directors, agents, representatives, and employees, as 20 well as any others acting on their behalf, are restrained from 21 doing the following: 22 1. Transferring any interest by sale, pledge, or grant of security interest, or otherwise disposing of, transferring, or encumbering the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1 to the Preliminary Injunction (“Exhibit 1”); 23 24 25 2. Concealing, hiding, or otherwise removing the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1; 26 3. Impairing the value of any of the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1; 27 28 /// 1 1 2 4. Removing the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1 from the principal place of business of Marker Oil or otherwise outside of the jurisdiction of this Judicial District; and 3 4 5 5. Disposing of the proceeds from the transfer of any interest of the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1 that may have occurred prior to issuance of this Order. 6 ECF No. 18. 7 adjudged, and decreed that Marker Oil and its officers, 8 directors, agents, representatives, and employees, as well as any 9 others acting on their behalf, are required to do the following: 10 1. Return the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1 to the principal place of business of Marker Oil at 205 N. Main Street, Alturas, California 96101 or such other location within the Judicial District agreeable to the parties for delivery to Plaintiff TCFIF Inventory Finance, Inc. (“TCFIF”); and 11 12 The preliminary injunction further ordered, 13 14 2. Maintain Marker Oil’s books and records and provide TCFIF full access to such books and records. 15 On April 6, 2018, the Court heard TCFIF’s motion for 16 contempt against Defendants for violating the preliminary 17 injunction. 18 Thompson Coburn LLP appeared on behalf of TCFIF, Tom Gifford of 19 the Law Office of Tom Gifford appeared by telephone on behalf of 20 Defendants, and Mr. Marker appeared in person. 21 ECF No. 38. William R. Bay and Jeffrey N. Brown of Following consideration of the parties’ written submissions 22 and oral argument, including statements made by Mr. Marker, the 23 Court grants TCFIF’s motion for contempt for the reasons stated 24 upon the record and holds Defendants in contempt. 25 finds that Defendants knowingly violated the preliminary 26 injunction as to eight units of the Subject Property by selling 27 the units and/or by removing the units from, or not returning the 28 units to, Marker Oil’s principal place of business. 2 The Court The Court 1 further finds that Defendants have not paid TCFIF for the eight 2 sold or otherwise missing units, for which they owe TCFIF 3 $139,653.28. 4 The Court sanctions Defendants, jointly and severally, and 5 orders them to pay $139,653.28 to TCFIF within 30 days after 6 entry of this order as compensation for the eight units. 7 Court further orders Defendants, jointly and severally, to pay an 8 additional $15,000.00 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this 9 order as reimbursement to TCFIF for its reasonable attorneys’ The 10 fees and costs incurred in pursuing this order of contempt 11 against Defendants. 1 12 amounts to TCFIF, TCFIF may present further briefing to the Court 13 regarding further appropriate sanctions to be entered against 14 Defendants. 15 If Defendants do not timely pay these The preliminary injunction issued on September 11, 2017 16 shall remain in full force and effect. 17 seeks a new writ of possession pursuant to the Court's order for 18 writ of possession dated September 11, 2017, ECF No. 19, TCFIF 19 shall file an application with the Court to that effect. 20 21 To the extent that TCFIF IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2018 22 23 24 25 1 26 27 28 The Court reviewed and considered the Declaration of William R. Bay concerning attorneys’ fees and costs. ECF No. 50. Although the attorneys’ rate appears reasonable, the Court found a number of their documented activities to be duplicative and reduced the award accordingly. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?