TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. Marker Oil Company, Inc. et al
Filing
51
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/2018 GRANTING 38 Motion for Contempt. The Court SANCTIONS Defendants, jointly and severally, and orders them to pay $139,653.28 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this order as compen sation for the eight units. The Court further orders Defendants, jointly and severally, to pay an additional $15,000.00 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this order as reimbursement to TCFIF for its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TCF INVENTORY FINANCE, INC.,
10
2:17-cv-1768-JAM-DB
Plaintiff,
11
12
No.
v.
MARKER OIL COMPANY, INC., and
BILLY LEON MARKER, JR.,
ORDER GRANTING TCF INVENTORY
FINANCE, INC.’S MOTION FOR
CONTEMPT AGAINST DEFENDANTS
13
Defendants.
14
15
On September 11, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary
16
injunction against Defendants Marker Oil Company, Inc. (“Marker
17
Oil”) and Billy Leon Marker, Jr. (collectively, “Defendants”)
18
ordering, adjudging, and decreeing that Marker Oil and its
19
officers, directors, agents, representatives, and employees, as
20
well as any others acting on their behalf, are restrained from
21
doing the following:
22
1. Transferring any interest by sale, pledge, or grant
of security interest, or otherwise disposing of,
transferring, or encumbering the Subject Property
identified in Exhibit 1 to the Preliminary
Injunction (“Exhibit 1”);
23
24
25
2. Concealing, hiding, or otherwise removing the
Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1;
26
3. Impairing the value of any of the Subject Property
identified in Exhibit 1;
27
28
///
1
1
2
4. Removing the Subject Property identified in Exhibit
1 from the principal place of business of Marker Oil
or otherwise outside of the jurisdiction of this
Judicial District; and
3
4
5
5. Disposing of the proceeds from the transfer of any
interest of the Subject Property identified in
Exhibit 1 that may have occurred prior to issuance
of this Order.
6
ECF No. 18.
7
adjudged, and decreed that Marker Oil and its officers,
8
directors, agents, representatives, and employees, as well as any
9
others acting on their behalf, are required to do the following:
10
1. Return the Subject Property identified in Exhibit 1
to the principal place of business of Marker Oil at
205 N. Main Street, Alturas, California 96101 or
such other location within the Judicial District
agreeable to the parties for delivery to Plaintiff
TCFIF Inventory Finance, Inc. (“TCFIF”); and
11
12
The preliminary injunction further ordered,
13
14
2. Maintain Marker Oil’s books and records and provide
TCFIF full access to such books and records.
15
On April 6, 2018, the Court heard TCFIF’s motion for
16
contempt against Defendants for violating the preliminary
17
injunction.
18
Thompson Coburn LLP appeared on behalf of TCFIF, Tom Gifford of
19
the Law Office of Tom Gifford appeared by telephone on behalf of
20
Defendants, and Mr. Marker appeared in person.
21
ECF No. 38.
William R. Bay and Jeffrey N. Brown of
Following consideration of the parties’ written submissions
22
and oral argument, including statements made by Mr. Marker, the
23
Court grants TCFIF’s motion for contempt for the reasons stated
24
upon the record and holds Defendants in contempt.
25
finds that Defendants knowingly violated the preliminary
26
injunction as to eight units of the Subject Property by selling
27
the units and/or by removing the units from, or not returning the
28
units to, Marker Oil’s principal place of business.
2
The Court
The Court
1
further finds that Defendants have not paid TCFIF for the eight
2
sold or otherwise missing units, for which they owe TCFIF
3
$139,653.28.
4
The Court sanctions Defendants, jointly and severally, and
5
orders them to pay $139,653.28 to TCFIF within 30 days after
6
entry of this order as compensation for the eight units.
7
Court further orders Defendants, jointly and severally, to pay an
8
additional $15,000.00 to TCFIF within 30 days after entry of this
9
order as reimbursement to TCFIF for its reasonable attorneys’
The
10
fees and costs incurred in pursuing this order of contempt
11
against Defendants. 1
12
amounts to TCFIF, TCFIF may present further briefing to the Court
13
regarding further appropriate sanctions to be entered against
14
Defendants.
15
If Defendants do not timely pay these
The preliminary injunction issued on September 11, 2017
16
shall remain in full force and effect.
17
seeks a new writ of possession pursuant to the Court's order for
18
writ of possession dated September 11, 2017, ECF No. 19, TCFIF
19
shall file an application with the Court to that effect.
20
21
To the extent that TCFIF
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 11, 2018
22
23
24
25
1
26
27
28
The Court reviewed and considered the Declaration of William R.
Bay concerning attorneys’ fees and costs. ECF No. 50. Although
the attorneys’ rate appears reasonable, the Court found a number
of their documented activities to be duplicative and reduced the
award accordingly.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?