Hill v. Strong
Filing
10
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/5/2018 ORDERING this case be randomly assigned to a U.S. District Judge and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CYMEYON HILL
12
No. 2:17-cv-01774 CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
TIAN STRONG,
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendant.
16
17
By order filed February 5, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave
18
to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff
19
has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
20
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be randomly assigned to a United States
District Judge.
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
27
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
28
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1
1
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
2
(9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: April 5, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Hill1774.fta(1).docx
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?