City of Stockton v. Reichl et al
Filing
6
MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of New Jersey. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and
of
foregoing is a true and correct cocy
original on file in my office.
the
ATTEST
WILLIAM T. WALSH, Clerk
United States District Court
New Jersey
Distric’
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
FILED
Sep 11, 2017
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MDL No. 2687
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -11)
On february 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See 159 F.Supp.3d 1382 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 29 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Jose L. Linares.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge
Linares.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of February 4, 2016, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable Jose L. Linares.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffeiy N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
SCHEDULE CTO-11
DIST
DIV.
MDL No. 2687
-
TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
17—01775
City of Stockton v. Reich! et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?