City of Stockton v. Reichl et al

Filing 6

MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of New Jersey. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and of foregoing is a true and correct cocy original on file in my office. the ATTEST WILLIAM T. WALSH, Clerk United States District Court New Jersey Distric’ UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION FILED Sep 11, 2017 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MDL No. 2687 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -11) On february 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 159 F.Supp.3d 1382 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 29 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Jose L. Linares. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Linares. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of February 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Jose L. Linares. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffeiy N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION SCHEDULE CTO-11 DIST DIV. MDL No. 2687 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION 17—01775 City of Stockton v. Reich! et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?