Mester v. Malakkla et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/15/2020 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MORRIS MESTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1781 JAM AC P v. ORDER N. MALAKKLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 21, 2019, this court adopted the findings and recommendations of the 21 magistrate judge assigned to this matter. ECF No. 60. At that time, plaintiff was declared a 22 three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and his in forma pauperis status 23 was revoked. See ECF No. 60 at 2. As a result, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fees within 24 thirty days of the date of that order prior to proceeding any further with this action. See id. In 25 addition, he was warned that failure to pay the fee within the period would result in a dismissal of 26 this case. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3 4 5 6 DATED: January 15, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?