Dunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/7/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED that Christopher Michael Dunn, will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28:2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28:2412(d). (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JOHN V. JOHNSON
Attorney for Plaintiff
MCGREGOR SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, Bar No. 230138
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
Karen S. Clark
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8979
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Karen.S.Clark@ssa.gov
Attorney for Defendant
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUNN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
__________________________________________ )
No. 2:17-cv-01791 DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval
21
of the Court, that Christopher Michael Dunn, will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND
22
FIVE HUNDRED and NO CENTS DOLLARS ($6,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28
23
U.S.C. section 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by
24
counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2412(d).
25
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Christopher Michael Dunn, the Defendant will consider
26
any assignment of EAJA fees to John V. Johnson pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010),
27
the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the
28
1
1
United States Department of Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant
2
will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
3
Fees shall be made payable to Christopher Michael Dunn, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
4
that Christopher Michael Dunn, does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to
5
be made directly to John V. Johnson, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payment made shall be
6
delivered to John V. Johnson.
7
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Christopher Michael Dunn’s request for EAJA
8
attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of the Defendant under EAJA. Payment of
9
the agreed amount shall constitute complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Christopher Michael
10
Dunn, and/or John V. Johnson may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is
11
without prejudice to the rights of John V. Johnson to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. section
12
406(b) subject to the savings clause provisions of EAJA.
13
Respectfully Submitted,
14
15
DATED: November 30, 2018
/ s / John V. Johnson
(As authorized
johnvjohnson@sbcglobal.net)
John V. Johnson
Attorney for Plaintiff
DATED: November 30, 2018
MCGREGOR SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH L. STACHEL Acting
Regional Chief Attorney, Region IX
Social Security Administration
16
17
18
19
20
21
By: / s / Karen S. Clark
KAREN S. CLARK
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 7, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.soc sec\dunn1791.stip.eaja.ord
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?