Dunn v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/7/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED that Christopher Michael Dunn, will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28:2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28:2412(d). (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN V. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff MCGREGOR SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, Bar No. 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration Karen S. Clark Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8979 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Karen.S.Clark@ssa.gov Attorney for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUNN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) __________________________________________ ) No. 2:17-cv-01791 DB STIPULATION AND ORDER It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval 21 of the Court, that Christopher Michael Dunn, will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND 22 FIVE HUNDRED and NO CENTS DOLLARS ($6,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 23 U.S.C. section 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by 24 counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2412(d). 25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Christopher Michael Dunn, the Defendant will consider 26 any assignment of EAJA fees to John V. Johnson pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), 27 the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the 28 1 1 United States Department of Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant 2 will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees shall be made payable to Christopher Michael Dunn, but if the Department of the Treasury determines 4 that Christopher Michael Dunn, does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to 5 be made directly to John V. Johnson, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payment made shall be 6 delivered to John V. Johnson. 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Christopher Michael Dunn’s request for EAJA 8 attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of the Defendant under EAJA. Payment of 9 the agreed amount shall constitute complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Christopher Michael 10 Dunn, and/or John V. Johnson may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is 11 without prejudice to the rights of John V. Johnson to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. section 12 406(b) subject to the savings clause provisions of EAJA. 13 Respectfully Submitted, 14 15 DATED: November 30, 2018 / s / John V. Johnson (As authorized johnvjohnson@sbcglobal.net) John V. Johnson Attorney for Plaintiff DATED: November 30, 2018 MCGREGOR SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH L. STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Attorney, Region IX Social Security Administration 16 17 18 19 20 21 By: / s / Karen S. Clark KAREN S. CLARK Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 7, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\dunn1791.stip.eaja.ord 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?