Tenore v. Horowitz et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/2019 GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL TENORE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1802 KJM KJN P

v.

ORDER

E. HOROWITZ, ET AL.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s

17
18

claims concerning his requests for in-cell feeding and a wedge pillow, as well as plaintiff’s claims

19

that Dr. Smith and Dr. Horowitz failed to timely diagnose plaintiff’s cancer and improperly

20

delayed plaintiff’s surgery. On September 9, 2019, the district court referred this matter back to

21

the undersigned for all further pretrial proceedings. (ECF No. 57.)
By order filed September 20, 2019, the parties were directed to inform the court whether a

22
23

settlement conference is appropriate. Both parties responded. Following review of the parties’

24

filings, the undersigned finds that a further settlement conference would not be appropriate.

25

On October 9, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Because the court

26

had not yet addressed the scheduling of a settlement conference, plaintiff is granted an extension

27

of time in which to oppose the motion for summary judgment.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date

2

of this order in which to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

3

Dated: November 4, 2019

4
5
6
7

/cw/teno1802.ext

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

MICHAEL TENORE,

7
8
9

No. 2:17-cv-1802 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE OF ELECTION RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

E. HOROWITZ, ET AL.,

10

Defendants.

11
12

1. As required by court order, the parties notify the court of the following election:

13

____ The party signing below requests a settlement conference.

14

____ Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b) of the Eastern District of California, the party signing

15

below affirmatively requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement

16

conference and, further, waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Magistrate Judge on

17

that basis thereafter. This waiver is not to be construed as consent to the Magistrate Judge’s

18

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

19
20
21
22

OR
____ The party signing below requests that a different judge hold the settlement
conference.
AND
2. Plaintiff indicates his preference by checking one:

23
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.
24
OR
25
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video conference.
26
27

DATED:
________________________________
Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants

28
1