Hernandez v. Thomas
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/2018 ADOPTING 31 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY HERNANDEZ,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-1803-KJM-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
THOMAS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
20
On August 31, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within the time specified therein (Doc. 31). No objections to these findings and recommendations
23
have been filed.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
25
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
27
1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
28
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2018 (Doc. 31), are
adopted in full;
4
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 17) is denied; and
5
3.
This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further
6
pretrial proceedings.
7
DATED: September 28, 2018.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?