Raulfs v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/22/19 GRANTING 29 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $8,600.00. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ROBERT C. WEEMS CABN 148156
WEEMS LAW OFFICES
769 Center Blvd., PMB 38
Fairfax, CA 94930
Telephone: (415) 881-7653
Facsimile: (866) 610-1430
Email: rcweems@weemslawoffices.com
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROL S. CLARK, MOBN 42670
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8975
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Carol S. Clark@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
MARC HORST RAULFS,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
27
28
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
No. 2:17-cv-01805-DB
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY
FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT
TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1920 AND ORDER
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
2
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be
3
awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of eight thousand six hundred
4
dollars ($8,600.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.
5
§ 2412(d), and no costs under U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents
6
compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
7
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
8
9
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government
will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel.
10
Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91
11
(2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are
12
subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
13
Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the
14
government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
15
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the
16
Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the
17
government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made
18
directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any
19
payments made shall be delivered to counsel.
20
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request
21
for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the
22
part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount
23
shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that
24
Plaintiff and/or counsel including counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA
25
attorney fees in connection with this action.
26
This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel and/or counsel’s
27
firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject
28
to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
2
1
2
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Robert C. Weems*
ROBERT C. WEEMS
* By email authorization on August 19, 2019
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: August 21, 2011
3
4
5
6
Dated: August 21, 2011
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
7
8
By: /s/ Carol S. Clark
CAROL S. CLARK
Special Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 1
14
15
DATED: August 22, 2019
16
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
In light of the parties’ stipulation, plaintiff’s June 19, 2019 motion for attorney’s
fees (ECF No. 29) is deemed withdrawn.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?