Thompson v. Lee et al
Filing
10
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/6/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNELLY THOMPSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1810 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
DR. BENJAMIN LEE,
Defendants.
16
17
By order filed September 29, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
18
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On November 7, 2017, plaintiff was granted up
19
to and including November 27, 2017, in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from
20
that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise
21
responded to the court’s order.
22
23
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign
a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1
1
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
2
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
3
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
4
(9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: December 6, 2017
6
7
/thom1810.fta.ext
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?