Blalock v. Kelso et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/29/2022 GRANTING 70 Request to Substitute. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation added. R. Miranda terminated. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulated dismissal pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii). CASE CLOSED(Perdue, C.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES BLALOCK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1813 TLN AC P v. ORDER J. CLARK KELSO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 The parties in this case have filed a stipulated substitution of parties seeking to substitute 17 18 the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for defendant Miranda. ECF No. 70. 19 The request to substitute parties will be granted. The California Department of Corrections and 20 Rehabilitation and plaintiff have also stipulated to dismissal of this case with prejudice pursuant 21 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and the stipulated dismissal will be honored. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The stipulated request to substitute the California Department of Corrections and 24 Rehabilitation for defendant Miranda (ECF No. 70) is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is 25 directed to update the docket accordingly. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ stipulated 2 dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). See ECF No. 70. 3 DATED: June 29, 2022 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?