Bradley v. Miller et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/5/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff's tardy 14 objections to the already-adopted findings and recommendations are OVERRULED as untimely. Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT, because plaintiff has already been granted in forma pauperis status on 10/27/2017, which continues automatically on appeal. No further motions will be entertained in this already-closed case. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE
BRADLEY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1834-MCE-KJN PS
ORDER
v.
JEFFREY MILLER, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On December 6, 2017, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned’s findings and
19
recommendations, and dismissed the case with prejudice. (ECF No. 12.) Thereafter, on
20
December 13, 2017, plaintiff filed tardy objections to the already-adopted findings and
21
recommendations. (ECF No. 14.) Subsequently, on January 3, 2018, plaintiff also filed a notice
22
of appeal accompanied by a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.)
23
Plaintiff’s tardy objections to the already-adopted findings and recommendations are
24
OVERRULED as untimely. Plaintiff was provided with an opportunity to file objections to the
25
findings and recommendations within a specified period of time, and in fact submitted timely
26
objections on November 15, 2017 (ECF No. 9), which were considered by the district judge.
27
(ECF No. 12.)
28
Furthermore, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED AS
1
1
MOOT, because plaintiff has already been granted in forma pauperis status on October 27, 2017
2
(ECF No. 6), which continues automatically on appeal.
3
No further motions will be entertained in this already-closed case.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
This order resolves ECF Nos. 14 and 18.
6
Dated: January 5, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?