Richardson v. Sessions et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/2018 ADOPTING in FULL 24 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss as to claims six through nine without leave to amend. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL RICHARDSON,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-01838 JAM AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

XAVIER BECERRA,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

19

On March 6, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

21

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 27. Defendant filed a response to the

23

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 28.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 6, 2018, are adopted in full; and

28

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8) is granted and plaintiff’s claims six
1

1

through nine are dismissed without leave to amend. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

2
3
4
5

October 24, 2018 

John A. Mendez_________________ 

United States District Court Judge 

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2