Lenkner et al v. County of Tehama
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 01/29/19 VACATING the 01/31/19 hearing on 51 , 52 , 52 Motions for Sanctions. The Defendant's motions are submitted on the briefs without oral argument due to plaintiffs' failure to file timely responses thereto. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEN ZIU THANG, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-1839-JAM-DMC
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF TEHAMA,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action.
17
18
Pending before the court are defendant’s motions for terminating sanctions as to plaintiffs Ken
19
Ziu Thang (Doc. 51), Shannon Saetern (Doc. 52), John Alderton (Doc. 53), set for hearing on
20
January 30, 2019. Because the only relief sought by defendant is sanctions based on failure to
21
provide discovery as order by the courts on December 7, 2018, briefing on the current motions is
22
governed by Eastern District of California Local Rule 251(e). Under this rule, responses to
23
defendant’s motions were due no later than seven days prior to the hearing date, or by January 23,
24
2019, in this case. See Local Rule 251(e). A review of the docket reflects plaintiffs have not
25
filed any response to defendant’s motion, which are therefore taken off calendar and submitted on
26
the briefs without oral argument.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that;
2
1.
3
4
Defendant’s motions are submitted on the briefs without oral argument due
to plaintiffs’ failure to file timely responses thereto; and
2.
The hearing set for January 31, 2019, is vacated.
5
6
7
Dated: January 29, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?