Walch v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER 8 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/31/2017 extending the deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 20, 2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386) Michael.Stortz@dbr.com MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN 273147) Matthew.Adler@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 MICHAEL W. MCTIGUE JR.* michael.mctigue@dbr.com MEREDITH C. SLAWE* meredith.slawe@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP One Logan Square, Suite 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 988-2700 Facsimile: (215) 988-2757 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC * pro hac vice to be sought 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 MARK WALCH, Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 Case No. 2:17-cv-01849-WBS-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, 21 Defendant. 22 23 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mark Walch (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant 24 25 Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (“Comcast”) on September 6, 2017 (Dkt. 26 No. 1); 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS, the initial deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint was October 9, 2017; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the current deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is November 6, 2017; WHEREAS, Comcast has acted with diligence in reviewing the Complaint and investigating Plaintiff’s allegations; 5 WHEREAS, the parties through counsel are currently engaged in meet and confer 6 regarding Comcast’s position that Plaintiff has agreed to resolve his claims in this action through 7 an individual arbitration proceeding; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, because the parties have not yet reached agreement as to the appropriate forum to resolve this case, they have met and conferred through counsel and agreed to continue Comcast’s deadline to respond to the Complaint by an additional 14 days; 11 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective 12 counsel that the deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be 13 extended to and including November 20, 2017. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: October 30, 2017 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 17 By: /s/ Matthew J. Adler Michael J. Stortz Matthew J. Adler 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 20 21 22 Dated: October 30, 2017 HYDE & SWIGART 23 24 By: /s/ Yana A. Hart (authorized 10.30.2017) Joshua B. Swigart Yana A. Hart 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK WALCH 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -2- CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -3- CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?