Walch v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER #8 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/31/2017 extending the deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 20, 2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN 273147)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
MICHAEL W. MCTIGUE JR.*
[e-mail]
MEREDITH C. SLAWE*
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
One Logan Square, Suite 2000
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC
* pro hac vice to be sought

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

MARK WALCH,
Plaintiff,

18
v.

19
20

Case No. 2:17-cv-01849-WBS-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC,

21
Defendant.
22
23
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mark Walch (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant

24
25

Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (“Comcast”) on September 6, 2017 (Dkt.

26

No. 1);

27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

WHEREAS, the initial deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint was October 9, 2017;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the current deadline for Comcast to
answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is November 6, 2017;
WHEREAS, Comcast has acted with diligence in reviewing the Complaint and
investigating Plaintiff’s allegations;

5

WHEREAS, the parties through counsel are currently engaged in meet and confer

6

regarding Comcast’s position that Plaintiff has agreed to resolve his claims in this action through

7

an individual arbitration proceeding;

8
9
10

WHEREAS, because the parties have not yet reached agreement as to the appropriate
forum to resolve this case, they have met and conferred through counsel and agreed to continue
Comcast’s deadline to respond to the Complaint by an additional 14 days;

11

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective

12

counsel that the deadline for Comcast to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be

13

extended to and including November 20, 2017.

14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16

Dated: October 30, 2017

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

17
By: /s/ Matthew J. Adler
Michael J. Stortz
Matthew J. Adler

18
19

Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC

20
21
22

Dated: October 30, 2017

HYDE & SWIGART

23
24

By: /s/ Yana A. Hart (authorized 10.30.2017)
Joshua B. Swigart
Yana A. Hart

25
26

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARK WALCH

27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

-2-

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN

1
2
3

ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2017

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

-3-

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01849-WBS-KJN