Burnett v. Caskey et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/24/2018 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 13, 2017 is AFFIRMED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARLOS ROMERO BURNETT,

12

No. 2: 17-cv-1856 GEB KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CASKEY, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on December 21, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for

17
18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed December 13, 2017 dismissing his complaint

19

with leave to amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

20

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court

21

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to

22

law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

24

magistrate judge filed December 13, 2017 is affirmed.

25

Dated: January 24, 2018

26
27
28
1