Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Ace American Insurance Company, et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/5/2017 EXTENDING Continental Casualty Co.'s deadline to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint. Responsive pleading due by 10/17/17. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
5 Sherman C. Lee (SBN 145765) CNA COVERAGE LITIGATION GROUP 555 – 12th Street Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: 510.645.2300 Facsimile: 510.645.2323 E-Mail: sherman.lee@cna.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant Continental Casualty Company 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:17-cv-01860-MCE-AC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER vs. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, dba CHUBB; CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, RENZENBERGER, INC., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (“Union Pacific”) and defendant 20 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (“Continental Casualty”), by and through their 21 attorneys of record in this case, hereby stipulate and agree that: 22 WHEREAS, Union Pacific filed its Complaint in this action on September 7, 2017; 23 WHEREAS, Continental Casualty’s responsive pleading is presently due on October 3, 24 25 26 2017; WHEREAS, Continental Casualty requested and Union Pacific agreed to a brief 14 day extension of time to the Complaint; 27 WHEREAS, the extension of time will not alter the date of any event or other deadline; 28 WHEREAS, no extension of time has been previously sought or requested; -1STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 WHEREAS, Local Rule 144(a) of the United State District Court for the Eastern District of 2 California provides that the parties may stipulate to extend the time for responding to a complaint 3 without leave of Court so long as all parties affected by the extension consent and the extension is no 4 longer than 28 days; 5 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through 6 their respective counsel, that Continental Casualty shall file its responsive pleading by October 17, 7 2017. 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 29, 2017 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 10 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Suzanne M. Nicholson Suzanne M. Nicholson Attorneys for Plaintiff UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 14 15 Dated: September 29, 2017 16 CNA COVERAGE LITIGATION GROUP By: 17 18 /s/ Sherman C. Lee Sherman C. Lee Attorney for Defendant Continental Casualty Company 19 20 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION 21 I hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, 22 23 24 concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. Dated: September 29, 2017 25 26 27 By: /s/ Sherman C. Lee Sherman C. Lee \\\ \\\ 28 -2STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 ORDER The Court, having duly considered the parties’ stipulation set forth above, and good cause appearing, orders as follows: Continental Casualty Co.’s deadline to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff’s Complaint is 5 extended to October 17, 2017. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: October 5, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?