Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/28/2018 GRANTING an Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file Opening Brief until 3/28/2018. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 KELSEY BROWN, CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1003 Whitman Street Tacoma, WA 98406 Phone: (206) 300-9063 Email: kelsey@mackenzielegal.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACREMENTO DIVISION 10 11 SHERRI NORRIS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:17-cv-1861 CKD vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. The parties hereby stipulate by counsel and in accordance with the scheduling order 17 Plaintiff shall have an extension of time to file Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. Plaintiff’s counsel has 18 been unwell and requires the rescheduling of some deadlines to properly address the issues. As a 19 solo practitioner, Plaintiff’s counsel is unable to complete the briefing at this time. Parties 20 stipulate to a 30-day extension. Opening Brief shall now be due on March 28, 2018. 21 22 23 24 25 26 The parties stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Dated February 26, 2018: /s/ Kelsey M Brown KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1003 Whitman Tacoma, WA 98406 1 (206) 300-9063 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 Dated February 26, 2018: 5 s/ KELSEY M. BROWN for Daniel Talbert DANIEL TALBERT (per e-mail authorization) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel 6 Of Attorneys for Defendant 4 7 8 9 ORDER The Court adopts the parties’ stipulation as outlined above. Plaintiff’s Opening brief is 10 now due on March 28, 2018. The Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) is modified accordingly. 11 Dated: February 28, 2018 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?