Cato v. Darst et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2018 GRANTING 18 Motion for Extension of Time and VACATING the time for Defendants to answer the complaint until after the court rules on 17 Motion to Dismiss. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
JAMES CATO,

Case No. 2:17-cv-01873 TLN EFB (PC)

12
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER
13
v.
14
15

M. DARST, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Having found that there is good cause to grant Defendants Darst and Romero’s first request

19

for an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court will vacate the time

20

for Defendants to answer the Complaint until after the Court rules on Defendants De La Garza,

21

Bennett, Snyder, and Campbell’s motion to dismiss.

22
23

Dated: September 12, 2018.

24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-01873 TLN EFB (PC))