Cato v. Darst et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/2019 GRANTING defendants' 37 motion for stay of discovery. Thus, if the Court denies defendants' motion for summary judgment, once that decision becomes final, the parties shall have 30 days' time from the date of the order denying summary judgment to serve responses to any pending discovery request served before the date of this Order. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
JAMES CATO,

Case No. 2:17-cv-01873 TLN EFB (PC)

12
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER
13
v.
14
15

M. DARST, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Having reviewed Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Stay of

19

Discovery, this Court finds good cause to grant Defendants’ Motion for Stay of Discovery. Thus,

20

if the Court denies Defendants’ motion, once that decision becomes final, the parties shall have

21

thirty (30) days’ time from the date of the order denying summary judgment to serve responses to

22

any pending discovery request served before the date of this Order.

23
24

Dated: October 17, 2019.

__________________________
The Honorable Edmund F. Brennan

25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-01873 TLN EFB (PC))