Cato v. Darst et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/30/20 GRANTING 49 Motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. Once the Courtissues a ruling on the Courts Findings and Recommendations as to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court will issue a revised Discovery & Scheduling Order, which will provide new dates to conduct merits-based discovery. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
JAMES CATO,

Case No. 2:17-cv-01873-TLN EFB (PC)

12
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING
ORDER

13
v.
14
15

M. DARST, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

The Court has reviewed Defendants’ Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling

19

Order. The Court finds that Defendants have demonstrated good cause to modify the discovery

20

and scheduling order. (ECF No. 34.) Defendants’ Motion is hereby GRANTED. Once the Court

21

issues a ruling on the Court’s Findings and Recommendations as to Defendant’s Motion for

22

Summary Judgment, the Court will issue a revised Discovery & Scheduling Order, which will

23

provide new dates to conduct merits-based discovery.

24
25

Dated: March 30, 2020.

26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Modifying Disc. and Scheduling Order (2:13-cv-02494 JAM DB (PC))