Myers et al v. Equifax Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/10/2017 GRANTING 5 Motion to Stay. All proceedings and deadlines in this case are stayed until the MDL resolves the Motions for Consolidation. CASE STAYED. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 ORDER STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS Plaintiffs, 16 17 Case No. 2:17-cv-01878-JAM-DB TERRY MYERS, SR., CHARLES O’NEAL, and those similarly situated, v. 18 19 EQUIFAX INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS USDC CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01878-JAM-DB 1 2 This Court has considered the Defendants’ Motion to Stay or, in the Alternative, for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. The Motion is 3 4 5 6 GRANTED. All proceedings and deadlines in this case are stayed until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation resolves the Motions for Consolidation and Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 filed in In re Equifax, Inc., Customer Data 7 8 9 Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 2800 (J.P.M.L. Sept. 11, 2017). SO ORDERED, this 10th day of October, 2017. 10 11 12 /s/ John A. Mendez______________________ Hon. John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS USDC CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01878-JAM-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?