Myers et al v. Equifax Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/10/2017 GRANTING 5 Motion to Stay. All proceedings and deadlines in this case are stayed until the MDL resolves the Motions for Consolidation. CASE STAYED. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
ORDER STAYING
THESE PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiffs,
16
17
Case No. 2:17-cv-01878-JAM-DB
TERRY MYERS, SR., CHARLES
O’NEAL, and those similarly situated,
v.
18
19
EQUIFAX INC., and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,
20
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS
USDC CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01878-JAM-DB
1
2
This Court has considered the Defendants’ Motion to Stay or, in the
Alternative, for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. The Motion is
3
4
5
6
GRANTED. All proceedings and deadlines in this case are stayed until the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation resolves the Motions for Consolidation and
Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 filed in In re Equifax, Inc., Customer Data
7
8
9
Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 2800 (J.P.M.L. Sept. 11, 2017).
SO ORDERED, this 10th day of October, 2017.
10
11
12
/s/ John A. Mendez______________________
Hon. John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS
USDC CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01878-JAM-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?