Adomitis v. Tahoe Forest Hospital District
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/14/2020 DISCHARGING the 24 order to show cause and ORDERING relator to pay sanctions in the amount of $250.00 for failure to serve the complaint on the defendant as ordered previ ously, and for failure to respond to the court's second order to show cause. Payment SHALL be made within fourteen (14) days. Having received notice of consent to dismiss the case from the United States, the court DISMISSES the entire action and orders the clerk of court to CLOSE the case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.,
FRANK ADOMITIS, an individual,
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1879 KJM
TAHOE FOREST HOSPITAL DISTRICT;
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
On July 28, 2020, the court ordered the sealed filings on the docket unsealed, and
18
19
ordered the relator, Frank Adomitis, to show cause why he did not serve the complaint on the
20
defendant as ordered in the court’s prior order to show cause, ECF No. 19. Order at 1, ECF
21
No. 24. The government filed a notice of consent to dismiss the case, ECF No. 25, but the relator
22
did not respond to the second order to show cause.
The court now discharges the order to show cause at ECF No. 24 and ORDERS
23
24
relator to pay sanctions in the amount of $250.00 for failure to serve the complaint on the
25
defendant as ordered previously, and for failure to respond to the court’s second order to show
26
cause. Payment SHALL be made within fourteen (14) days.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
3
4
Having received notice of consent to dismiss the case from the United States, the
court DISMISSES the entire action and orders the clerk of court to CLOSE the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: October 14, 2020.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?