Williams v. Romero et al

Filing 116

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/16/21 ORDERING ( Settlement Conference set for 5/25/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.) The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settle ment statements 7 days prior to the settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the court using the following email address: [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his non-confidential settlement state ment Attn: Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814 so that it arrives at least 7 days prior to the settlement conference. The envelope shall be marked SETTLEMENT STATEMENT. The date and time of t he settlement conference shall be prominently indicated on the settlementstatement. If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). (cc: ADR Director and KJN)(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LANCE WILLIAMS,

12

No. 2:17-cv-1884 TLN DB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ROMERO, et al.,

15

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to

17
18

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement

19

conference.1 Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for the

20

court’s Settlement Week program to conduct a settlement conference on May 25, 2021 at 9:00

21

////

22
While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to
order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences… .” United States
v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9 th Cir.
2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The
term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to
fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G.
Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official
Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also
have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v.
Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D.
at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the
requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

1
2

a.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means, to be determined at a later

3

date and time. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order in due course.

4

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J.

6

Newman on May 25, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote

7

means, to be determined at a later date and time.

8
9

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person

10

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.

11

The failure of any counsel, party, or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person

12

may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not proceed and will be

13

reset to another date.

14

4. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement statements seven days

15

prior to the settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the

16

court using the following email address: [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his

17

non-confidential settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, USDC CAED,

18

501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814 so that it arrives at least seven (7) days prior to

19

the settlement conference. The envelope shall be marked “SETTLEMENT STATEMENT.” The

20

date and time of the settlement conference shall be prominently indicated on the settlement

21

statement. If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may

22

do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e).

23

Dated: March 16, 2021

24
25
26
DLB9/DB/prisoner-civil rights/will1884.med

27
28
2