Williams v. Romero et al
Filing
199
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 04/19/2024 VACATING 197 Findings and Recommendations and Defendants may file a Response to Plaintiff's Pretrial Statement within 10 days of the date of this Order. (Nair, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LANCE WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ROMERO, et al.,
15
No. 2:17-cv-1884 TLN DB P
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42
18
U.S.C. §1983. On September 8, 2023, this court ordered the parties to file pretrial statements.
19
(ECF No. 195.) Plaintiff’s statement was due February 23, 2024 but was not filed by that date.
20
Defendants timely filed their statement on March 8, 2024. (ECF No. 196.)
21
Based on plaintiff’s failure to file a pretrial statement, on March 26, this court issued
22
findings and recommendations in which it recommended this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s
23
failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (ECF No. 197.) The following day,
24
plaintiff filed his pretrial statement. (ECF No. 198.) This court will accept plaintiff’s pretrial
25
statement and will vacate the March 26 findings and recommendations. Defendants will be
26
permitted to file a response to plaintiff’s statement. However, they are not required to do so.
27
After the court receives a response from defendants or the time for doing so has lapsed, this court
28
will issue a pretrial order and set this case for trial.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
2. Within ten days of the date of this order defendants may file a response to plaintiff’s
4
5
The March 26, 2024 findings are recommendations (ECF No. 197) are vacated; and
pretrial statement.
Dated: April 19, 2024
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/will1884.p pts resp
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?